Home Maxims & Terms Reading of a plaint meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reading of a plaint

Reading of a plaint legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 314 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O. VII, Rr. 1 & 7Reading of a plaint"Facts constituting a cause of action"Connotation

Facts constituting a cause of action had to be pleaded and where the plaint did not disclose the cause of action, it was not a plaint in the eye of the law

"Cause of action" was a bundle of facts which were alleged by the plaintiff to secure the relief sought by him

Prayer clause in the plaint was the substance of the plaint, and where no relief was claimed in the plaint, the plaint must be looked into as a whole in order to determine the relief that may be granted, if the same was decipherable from the reading of the plaint

Prayer clause cannot be read in isolation, but it would be read with the case set up by the plaint .

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reading of a plaint", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940373

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reading of a plaint"

PLD 2013
2013-March-25

P L D 2013 Sindh 314

MARI GAS COMPANY LTD. Through Arshad Iqbal — Plaintiff Versus BYCO PETROLEUM PAKISTAN LTD. Through Chief Executive Officer and another — Defendants

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
Transfer Petition No. 34 of 1987, decided on 18th November, 1987

1988 C L C 308

THE CHAIRMAN, KARACHI WATER AND Versus S. WAZIR HYDER and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1981
Regular First Appeal No. 42 of 1980, heard on 28th September, 1980.

1981 C L C 1009

N. A, SHAH RIYAR‑Appellant Versus MESSRS CONFORCE LTD., LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1991
Civil Revision No.962‑D of 1990, decided on 14th May, 1990.

1991CLC82

MARDAN ALI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus RAB NAWAZ and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1989
Regular, Second Appeal No.1311 of 1970, heard on 15th October, 988.

P L D 1989 Lahore 142

SARDAR ALI and others‑‑Appellants Versus MUKHTAR BEGUM (deceased) represented

Court:
PLD 1993
R.F.A. No.121 of 1989, heard on 22nd December, 1992.

P L D 1993 Lahore 183

Mst. IQBAL BEGUM ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus I FAROOQ INAYAT and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: 0. VII, R.11 ‑‑‑ Interpretation ‑‑‑ Provisions of O VII, R.11, C.P.C. are procedural and such provisions must not be read in isolation and, if intrinsic aid is afforded in their interpretation by other provisions of the Code, that aid must be made use of. p. 191 A
CLC 1987
Civil Revision No. 196 of 1982, decided on 13th March, 1983.

1987 C L C 1219

MURAD ALI and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus SANAULLAH‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1978
Revision Application No. 25~ of 1975, decided on 28th November 1977.

P L D 1978 Karachi 267

DIN MUHAMMAD AND 6 OTHERS‑Petitioners/ Plaintiffs Versus MEHAR ALI KHAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents/Defendants

Court: ‑.‑ O. VII, r. 11(d)‑Plaint, rejection of‑Prayer clause of plaint‑Not to be read in isolation and divorced from case set no in plaint Conclusion as to suit being barred by any law‑Must be based on statement in plaint ‑‑‑Court to apply its wind to case of plaintiff as set out in body of plaint as a whole assuming all averments made therein to be true in manner and form without taking into conside ration pleadings raised in defence‑Defence pleas could be considered while dismissing suit and not while rejecting plaint. ‑Plaint.
MLD 2025
N/A

2025 M L D 1621

Sajjad Haider and others — Petitioners Versus Syed Ali Rizwan Kazmi and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)
SCMR 2007
Appeal No.96 of 2003, decided on 9th February, 2007.

2007 S C M R 945

ABDUL HAMID and another — Appellants Versus DILAWAR HUSSAIN alias BHALLI and others — Respondents Civil

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan