Home Maxims & Terms Pensionary emoluments meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pensionary emoluments

Pensionary emoluments legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 SCMR 1108 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Pensionary emolumentsRisk allowance and fixed daily allowance, entitlement toPeriod of leave preparatory to retirement

Police official, after completion of 26 years of service applied for leave preparatory to retirement with effect from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009, which was duly allowed

Pensionary dues of police official were calculated by the police department out of which a deduction of Rs.81,900 was made on the basis that he was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance on account of Punjab Government Notification No.8904/FI dated 26-5-2009

Police official filed constitutional petition before High Court contending that department had made the deduction illegally under the garb of the said notification

High Court allowed the constitutional petition and held that police official could not be deprived of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance under the garb of the notification in question

Plea of department that in view of notification in question benefit of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance could only be availed by officers on duty and any officer who was on leave for a period of more than 4 months could not avail the allowances

Validity

Admittedly police official was on leave from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009

Notification in question stated that an officer who was on leave for a period beyond 4 months, was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance

Department had rightly made deductions from pensionary emoluments of police official

Impugned order of High Court was set aside and it was held by Supreme Court that police official was only entitled to 4 months risk allowance and fixed daily allowance, and if any deductions for the 4 months period had been made from his pensionary emoluments, the same might accordingly be adjusted

Appeal was allowed accordingly.

2013 PLC(CS) 1458 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Pensionary emolumentsRisk allowance and fixed daily allowance, entitlement toPeriod of leave preparatory to retirement

Police official, after completion of 26 years of service applied for leave preparatory to retirement with effect from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009, which was duly allowed

Pensionary dues of police official were calculated by the police department out of which a deduction of Rs.81,900 was made on the basis that he was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance on account of Punjab Government Notification No.8904/FI dated 26-5-2009

Police official filed constitutional petition before High Court contending that department had made the deduction illegally under the garb of the said notification

High Court allowed the constitutional petition and held that police official could not be deprived of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance under the garb of the notification in question

Plea of department that in view of notification in question benefit of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance could only be availed by officers on duty and any officer who was on leave for a period of more than 4 months could not avail the allowances

Validity

Admittedly police official was on leave from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009

Notification in question stated that an officer who was on leave for a period beyond 4 months, was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance

Department had rightly made deductions from pensionary emoluments of police official

Impugned order of High Court was set aside and it was held by Supreme Court that police official was only entitled to 4 months risk allowance and fixed daily allowance, and if any deductions for the 4 months period had been made from his pensionary emoluments, the same might accordingly be adjusted

Appeal was allowed accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pensionary emoluments", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940377

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pensionary emoluments"

PLC(CS) 2013
Civil Appeal No.286-L of 2011 out of Civil Petition No.981-L of 2010, decided on 2nd May, 2013.

2013 P L C (C

CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE and 4 others Versus LIAQUAT ALI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2013
Civil Appeal No.286-L of 2011 out of Civil Petition No.981-L of 2010, decided on 2nd May, 2013.

2013 S C M R 1108

CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE and 4 others — Appellants Versus LIAQUAT ALI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2003
Civil Petition No.3403 of 2001, decided on 21st March, 2003.

2003 S C M R 1037

N/A

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2003
Civil Petition No.3403 of 2001, decided on 21st March, 2003.

2003 P L C (C

MANAGING DIRECTOR. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS CARRIAGE FACTORY ISLAMABAD Versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 2010
F.A.O. No.102/L of 2008, decided on 15th December, 2008.

2010 P L C 13

ALLIED BANK LTD. Versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2018
Civil Appeals Nos. 17-K to 42-K of 2017, decided on 16th November, 2017.

2018 P L C (C

ABDUL JABBAR and others Versus GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2018
Civil Appeals Nos. 17-K to 42-K of 2017, decided on 16th November, 2017.

2018 S C M R 64

ABDUL JABBAR and others — Appellants Versus GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2008
Appeals Nos.1287(R)(C.S.), 1288(R)(C.S.), 1289(R)(C.S.), 1315(R)(C.S.) of 2003 and 139(R)(C.S.) of 2004, decided on 1st June,. 2004.

2008 P L C (C

ABDUL HAQ and others Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD and A.G.P.R.

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 2013
N/A

2013 P L C (C

INAAM ELAHI NASIR and others Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLC(CS) 2020
Writ Petition No.5614-P of 2018, decided on 4th December, 2019.

2020 P L C (C

Mst. HAJIRA BIBI Versus CIVIL ADMIN OFFICER, PAF BASE, PESHAWAR and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court