Pensionary emoluments
Pensionary emoluments legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Police official, after completion of 26 years of service applied for leave preparatory to retirement with effect from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009, which was duly allowed
Pensionary dues of police official were calculated by the police department out of which a deduction of Rs.81,900 was made on the basis that he was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance on account of Punjab Government Notification No.8904/FI dated 26-5-2009
Police official filed constitutional petition before High Court contending that department had made the deduction illegally under the garb of the said notification
High Court allowed the constitutional petition and held that police official could not be deprived of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance under the garb of the notification in question
Plea of department that in view of notification in question benefit of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance could only be availed by officers on duty and any officer who was on leave for a period of more than 4 months could not avail the allowances
Validity
Admittedly police official was on leave from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009
Notification in question stated that an officer who was on leave for a period beyond 4 months, was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance
Department had rightly made deductions from pensionary emoluments of police official
Impugned order of High Court was set aside and it was held by Supreme Court that police official was only entitled to 4 months risk allowance and fixed daily allowance, and if any deductions for the 4 months period had been made from his pensionary emoluments, the same might accordingly be adjusted
Appeal was allowed accordingly.
Police official, after completion of 26 years of service applied for leave preparatory to retirement with effect from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009, which was duly allowed
Pensionary dues of police official were calculated by the police department out of which a deduction of Rs.81,900 was made on the basis that he was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance on account of Punjab Government Notification No.8904/FI dated 26-5-2009
Police official filed constitutional petition before High Court contending that department had made the deduction illegally under the garb of the said notification
High Court allowed the constitutional petition and held that police official could not be deprived of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance under the garb of the notification in question
Plea of department that in view of notification in question benefit of risk allowance and fixed daily allowance could only be availed by officers on duty and any officer who was on leave for a period of more than 4 months could not avail the allowances
Validity
Admittedly police official was on leave from 1-1-2009 to 31-12-2009
Notification in question stated that an officer who was on leave for a period beyond 4 months, was not entitled to risk allowance and fixed daily allowance
Department had rightly made deductions from pensionary emoluments of police official
Impugned order of High Court was set aside and it was held by Supreme Court that police official was only entitled to 4 months risk allowance and fixed daily allowance, and if any deductions for the 4 months period had been made from his pensionary emoluments, the same might accordingly be adjusted
Appeal was allowed accordingly.
"Pensionary emoluments", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940377
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pensionary emoluments"
2013 P L C (C
CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE and 4 others Versus LIAQUAT ALI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2013 S C M R 1108
CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, LAHORE and 4 others — Appellants Versus LIAQUAT ALI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2003 S C M R 1037
N/A
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2003 P L C (C
MANAGING DIRECTOR. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS CARRIAGE FACTORY ISLAMABAD Versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2010 P L C 13
ALLIED BANK LTD. Versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS
Court: Lahore High Court2018 P L C (C
ABDUL JABBAR and others Versus GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 S C M R 64
ABDUL JABBAR and others — Appellants Versus GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2008 P L C (C
ABDUL HAQ and others Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD and A.G.P.R.
Court: Federal Service Tribunal2013 P L C (C
INAAM ELAHI NASIR and others Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Islamabad High Court2020 P L C (C
Mst. HAJIRA BIBI Versus CIVIL ADMIN OFFICER, PAF BASE, PESHAWAR and 2 others
Court: Peshawar High Court