Disqualification to contest election
Disqualification to contest election legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Principal accused purchased properties in the names of petitioners who were his sons and were minors at the time of purchase
Both petitioners entered into plea bargaining and surrendered properties in question
Trial Court as the time of approval of plea bargaining imposed conviction upon both the petitioners as provided under S.15 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Validity
Ages of petitioners were to be counted from the day when offence was committed and not when it was compounded and or plea bargain was accepted
On the day when alleged offence was committed, ages of petitioners were less than 10 and 12 years respectively
Petitioners, even if had committed any offence, were entitled to benefit of immature understating
Nothing was available on record to show that petitioners themselves committed offence of corruption and corrupt practices as they were of very tender ages and had no knowledge or understanding of corruption or corrupt practices committed by their father, might it be for their benefits
Bar of disqualification for a period of 21 years through order in terms of S.15 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, for seeking or from being elected, chosen, appointed or nominated as member or representative of any public office or any statutory or local authority of Government of Pakistan would not apply to petitioners
Petition was allowed accordingly.
"Disqualification to contest election", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940381
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disqualification to contest election"
P L D 2008 Supreme Court 412
Mir MUHAMMAD ALI RIND — Petitioner Versus ZAHOOR AHMED and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2003 S C M R 89
GHULAM AKBAR LASI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER FOR NA‑270 AWARAN‑CUM-LASBELLA and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2007 SCMR 507
ATIQUE REHMAN — Appellant Versus Haji KHAN AFZAL and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2003 Quetta 1
GHULAM AKBAR LASI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus RETURNING OFFICER FOR NA‑270, AWARAN‑CUM‑LASBELLA AT UTHAL
Court: ‑‑‑‑Ss. 15, proviso & 25 as substituted by National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XXXV of 2001)‑‑‑Disqualification to contest election‑‑ Voluntary return/plea bargaining‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Person availing benefit of S.25 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 would be deemed to have been convicted under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 and would stand disqualified for. a period of 10 years for seeking or from being elected, chosen, appointed or nominated as a member or representative of any public body or any statutory or Local Authority.2016 C L C 196
SHAMS-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER FOR ASTORE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit Baltistan Chief Court2003 Y L R 374
Makhdoom Syed ALI RAZA SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2008 C L C 1106
MULAZAM ABBAS KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus MUDASSAR HUSSAIN KHAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2019 Supreme Court 702
CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Presecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad — Appellant Versus MIR FAIQ ALI JAMALI — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2003 Supreme Court 355
Sh. ARSALAN HAFEEZ — Petitioner Versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI AT ATTOCK and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1993 M L D 2489
Syeda ABIDA HUSSAIN‑‑‑Appellant Versus RETURNING OFFICER and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Election Tribunal Punjab