Home Maxims & Terms Disqualification to contest election meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Disqualification to contest election

Disqualification to contest election legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 1137 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 15 & 25(b)Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 83Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionPlea bargain and convictionAct of childDisqualification to contest election

Principal accused purchased properties in the names of petitioners who were his sons and were minors at the time of purchase

Both petitioners entered into plea bargaining and surrendered properties in question

Trial Court as the time of approval of plea bargaining imposed conviction upon both the petitioners as provided under S.15 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999

Validity

Ages of petitioners were to be counted from the day when offence was committed and not when it was compounded and or plea bargain was accepted

On the day when alleged offence was committed, ages of petitioners were less than 10 and 12 years respectively

Petitioners, even if had committed any offence, were entitled to benefit of immature understating

Nothing was available on record to show that petitioners themselves committed offence of corruption and corrupt practices as they were of very tender ages and had no knowledge or understanding of corruption or corrupt practices committed by their father, might it be for their benefits

Bar of disqualification for a period of 21 years through order in terms of S.15 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, for seeking or from being elected, chosen, appointed or nominated as member or representative of any public office or any statutory or local authority of Government of Pakistan would not apply to petitioners

Petition was allowed accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Disqualification to contest election", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124940381

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Disqualification to contest election"

PLD 2008
2007-December-19

P L D 2008 Supreme Court 412

Mir MUHAMMAD ALI RIND — Petitioner Versus ZAHOOR AHMED and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2003
Civil Petitions Nos, 1558, 1559 and 1560 of 2002, decided on 25th September, 2002.

2003 S C M R 89

GHULAM AKBAR LASI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER FOR NA‑270 AWARAN‑CUM-LASBELLA and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2007
Civil Appeal No.970 of 2003, decided on 2nd October, 2006.

2007 SCMR 507

ATIQUE REHMAN — Appellant Versus Haji KHAN AFZAL and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2003
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 478, 479 and 480 of 2002, decided on 19th September, 2002.

P L D 2003 Quetta 1

GHULAM AKBAR LASI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus RETURNING OFFICER FOR NA‑270, AWARAN‑CUM‑LASBELLA AT UTHAL

Court: ‑‑‑‑Ss. 15, proviso & 25 as substituted by National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XXXV of 2001)‑‑‑Disqualification to contest election‑‑ Voluntary return/plea bargaining‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Person availing benefit of S.25 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 would be deemed to have been convicted under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 and would stand disqualified for. a period of 10 years for seeking or from being elected, chosen, appointed or nominated as a member or representative of any public body or any statutory or Local Authority.
CLC 2016
2015-May-19

2016 C L C 196

SHAMS-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER FOR ASTORE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit Baltistan Chief Court
YLR 2003
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 and 925/M of 2002 in Criminal Appeal No. 23‑E of 2002 (Rwp.), decided on 19th August, 2002.

2003 Y L R 374

Makhdoom Syed ALI RAZA SHAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2008
N/A

2008 C L C 1106

MULAZAM ABBAS KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus MUDASSAR HUSSAIN KHAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2019
2019-July-8

P L D 2019 Supreme Court 702

CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU through Presecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad — Appellant Versus MIR FAIQ ALI JAMALI — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2003
2002-December-17

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 355

Sh. ARSALAN HAFEEZ — Petitioner Versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, DISTRICT RAWALPINDI AT ATTOCK and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1993
Election Appeal No.2 of 1993, decided on 12th September 1993.

1993 M L D 2489

Syeda ABIDA HUSSAIN‑‑‑Appellant Versus RETURNING OFFICER and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Punjab