Proclamation of sale
Proclamation of sale legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Order XXI, R. 66(1), C.P.C. is mandatory in nature whereby the auction of the property would not be held without proclamation
Object of proclamation is nothing but to have an open, fair and transparent auction in order to eliminate all chances of any maneuver at the cost of the rights and interests of the judgment debtor
Proclamation is, therefore, must and failure thereof would result in setting aside such exercise, unless the judgment debtor validates the same by open and clear stance
Any irregularity in drawing up the proclamation is procedural and directory in nature and unless the irregularity is complained to have resulted in serious prejudice to the judgment debtor, the irregularity would not be taken as fatal.
Purpose behind enactment of O. XXI, Rr. 54 & 66, C.P.C., was to give wide publicity to the sale of the property so that maximum number of people may turn up to participate in it and give bids that matched the price the property deserved.
Such omission would render proclamation to be illegal and make auction proceedings liable to be set aside.
Such omission would render proclamation to be illegal and make auction proceedings liable to be set aside.
"Proclamation of sale", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124941641
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Proclamation of sale"
1998 P T D 1076
N. BALA RAJU and another Versus TAX RECOVERY OFFICER and another
Court: 221 I T R 3611982 P T D 77
S. S. NAVALGI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
Court: Karnataka High Court (India)2013 C L D 1398
Messrs NIB BANK LIMITED — Decree-Holder Versus Messrs APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED and 2 others — Judgment-Debtor
Court: SindhP L D 2013 Sindh 430
Messrs NIB BANK LIMITED — Decree-Holder Versus Messrs APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED and 2 others — Judgment-Debtor
Court: High CourtP L D 1961 Dacca 303
LUTFOR RAHMAN‑Petitioner Versus Mst. TAHERA KHATUN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court2002 P T D 1229
S.V. MUZUMDAR Versus TAX RECOVERY OFFICER and others
Court: 241 I T R 4812016 C L C 204
ASIF ALI KHAN and another — Appellants Versus STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LIMITED and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2015 C L D 1813
ASIF ALI KHAN and another — Appellants Versus STANDARD CHARTERED BANK LIMITED and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2024 C L D 1373
Syed Ayaz haider — Appellant Versus National Bank of Pakistan and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2024 Y L R 2773
Syed Ayaz haider — Appellant Versus National Bank of Pakistan and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh