Home Maxims & Terms Agency by ratification meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Agency by ratification

Agency by ratification legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 641 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.196Agency by ratificationScope

One of the established essentials of ratification in law was that the purported agent must have been acting in the name of the purported principal, always having been representing himself as a lawful agent of the same

Acts done by a person in his own name and in his separate legal capacity were not capable of subsequent ratification by another person.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Agency by ratification", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124941667

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Agency by ratification"

YLR 2012
Khadim Hussain v. Muhammad Fazil and others 1999 YLR 1529; Messrs Mohib Exports Ltd. and 4 others v. Trust Leading Corporation Ltd. Lahore through its Chief Executive and another 2005 CLD 581; Muhammad Yasin alias Punoo and 2 others v. Muhammad Yunus and 2 others 2006 CLC 1257; Mst. Surayya Kausar v. Muhammad Asmatullah 2000 MLD 507; Muhammad Yaqub v. The Settlement Authority and others 1973 SCMR 484 and Abdul Rehman v. Mst. Khanum Bibi and another (Civil Appeal No.66 of 2006 decided on 19-10-2010) distinguished.

2012 Y L R 2152

MANZOOR BEGUM — Appellant Versus Haji FAZAL ELLAHI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
YLR 2007
High Court Appeal No.261 of 2005, decided on 20th April, 2006.

2007 Y L R 1745

TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. — Appellant Versus Haji KHUDA BUX AMIR UMAR LTD. — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 1985
Civil Revision No. 228 of 1978, decided on 22nd May, 1985.

1985 C L C 2214

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN-Petitioner Versus JEHAN BAHADUR and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1989
High Court Appeals Nos.53 and 54 of 1982, decided on 30th March, 1989.

P L D 1989 Karachi 499

GULFAM and another‑‑Appellants Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Art. 114‑‑Estoppel‑‑Doctrine of estoppel is an equitable doctrine, a rule of exclusion which implies that if a person had by act or omission altered his position, he would be estopped and be precluded or debarred from denying it:‑Estoppel.
PLD 2013
2012-December-7

P L D 2013 Supreme Court 190

UNAIR ALI KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus FAIZ RASOOL and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2019
N/A

P L D 2019 Lahore 717

NIAMAT ALI and others — Petitioners Versus GULAM JILIANI and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1975
Suit No. 248 of 1969, decided on 9th June 1975.

P L D 1975 Karachi 870

THE AUSTRALASIA BANK LIMITED, KARACHI-Plaintiff Versus MESSRS FARUQUI HOUSE BUILDING CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS-Defendants

Court:
YLR 2020
N/A

2020 Y L R 1711

QAMAR KHURSHID and others — Appellants Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR-I and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
YLR 1999
Civil Appeal No.42 of 1998, decided on 30th April, 1999.

1999 Y L R 1529

KHADIM HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAZIL and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)
PLD 2013
2013-June-26

P L D 2013 Sindh 555

MEDIA MAX (PVT) LTD. Through Chief Executive — Plaintiff Versus ARY COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. Through Chief Executive and another — Defendants

Court: High Court