Description of suit property
Description of suit property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Plaintiff, though in his plaint had mentioned Khata number and Khasra number of suit property along with measurement, but it was nowhere disclosed that in which revenue estate the suit property situated
Effect
Basic requirement of Order VII, R.3, C.P.C. was that when subject-matter of the suit was an immovable property, the plaint would contain description of the property, sufficient to identify the same
Purpose of R.3 of Order VII, C.P.C. was that, if a decree was drawn, it should contain specific descriptions of the property, so that there could not be a confusion or hardship at the time of its execution
Court would not pass a vague decree, term of which, could not be ascertained with reasonable exactitude, which later on, could not be executed
Decree should be of such a nature that the Executing Court should execute the same, without going beyond it or making its own interpretation.
"Description of suit property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124941704
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Description of suit property"
P L D 2016 Balochistan 81
BOLAN MINING ENTERPRISES through Site Incharge — Petitioner Versus GHOUS BAKSH and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1988 S C M R 1567
BAQAR and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN — Respondent
Court: High Court1979 S C M R159
MUHAMMAD MUNAWAR‑Petitioner Versus Ch. KHURSHID ALAM‑Respondent
Court: ---S. 152‑Correction of accidental errors‑Rent Controller committing error as to description of suit property in his order such error being apparent on face of record and there being no dispute as to identity of property‑Appeal against such order to District Judge failing Contention that Rent Controller's order having merged in order passed by District Judge, Rent Controller devoid of jurisdiction to correct error, held, only technical inasmuch District Judge could have competently carried out such correction himself.‑Jurisdiction.2015 C L C 1555
BIBI BABO — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and another — Respondents
Court: BalochistanP L D 1993 Lahore 88
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and others ‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus HASSAN RAZA ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court:2017 M L D 227
IZAT SHAH — Petitioner Versus INTIZAR GUL — Respondent
Court: Peshawar2003 C L C 1555
MUHAMMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALSAM — Respondent
Court: Lahore1989 M L D 4107
Syed BUKHTIAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Applicant Versus Syed SHARAFAT HUSSAIN and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi2019 C L C Note 8
AURANGZEB MALIK — Petitioner Versus GHULAM SARWAR — Respondent
Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)2001C L C 649
ABDUL HAMEED‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore