Alteration of memorandum
Alteration of memorandum legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Section 92 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 left it to the discretion of a company to increase its share capital which may be done by conferring the authorization in the Articles of Association of a company
Power resided in the company by virtue of its Articles and primary power that S. 92 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 dealt with was the increase in the share capital of a company which was the alteration of its share capital
Alteration in the Memorandum and the Articles of Association naturally flows from such act of the alteration of the share capital of a company and mere fact that S. 92 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 did not make a mention of the alteration in the Articles of Association, did not detract from the fact that such alteration will be brought about and, therefore, S. 28 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 would be triggered in such circumstances.
Appellant company filed Form-A and Form-26, stating paid-up capital of the company as Rs.10 million divided into 100,000 shares of Rs.100 each
Company submitted an application stating that paid-up capital was incorrectly mentioned due to typing error and company's paid-up capital actually of Rs.10,000 constituting 100 shares of Rs.100 each
Company requested the Commission to rectify the mistake of paid-up capital
Request of the company was not accepted on the ground that it being matter of reduction of paid-up capital, same fell under jurisdiction of High Court in terms of Ss.96 & 97 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984
Contention of the company was that it was a typing mistake and not a matter of reduction of capital
Validity
Effect of rectification sought by the company, would be reduction of capital, and the power to reduce the capital, rested with the High Court
Alteration in memorandum could only be done in respect of the objects of the company stated in S.21(1)(a) to (g) of Companies Ordinance, 1984, which did not include alteration in the share capital of the company
Remedy had clearly been provided in Ss.96 & 97 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, whereby the High Court had the exclusive jurisdiction in the matter.
"Alteration of memorandum", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942051
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Alteration of memorandum"
P L D 1967 Karachi 695
Miscellaneous Petition No. 11 of 1966
Court: High Court2013 C L D 1432
SUCCESS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus The REGISTRAR (SECP) — Respondent
Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan2017 C L D 1411
COBUSSEN PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LIMITED through Special Attorney and another — Petitioners Versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2015 C L D 323
JAHANGIR SIDDIQUI & CO. LTD. through Chief Executive Officer — Plaintiff Versus HUM NETWORK LTD. through Chief Executive and another — Defendants
Court: SindhP L D 1964 Dacca 666
Court:
P L D 1984 Karachi 225
Court:
P L D 1982 Lahore 664
TAJ WOOLEN MILLS LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS, ASSISTANT OF OFFICE OF
Court:2009 C L D 1
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS — Defendant
Court: Federal Shariat CourtP L D 2009 Federal Shariat Court 1
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS — Defendant
Court: High CourtP L D 1966 Dacca 204
CHITTAGONG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY‑Appellant Versus C. S. LTD.‑Respondent
Court: