Home Maxims & Terms Alteration of memorandum meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Alteration of memorandum

Alteration of memorandum legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 CLD 587 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 92, 28 & 21Power of company limited by shares to alter its share capitalAlteration of ArticlesAlteration of memorandum

Section 92 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 left it to the discretion of a company to increase its share capital which may be done by conferring the authorization in the Articles of Association of a company

Power resided in the company by virtue of its Articles and primary power that S. 92 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 dealt with was the increase in the share capital of a company which was the alteration of its share capital

Alteration in the Memorandum and the Articles of Association naturally flows from such act of the alteration of the share capital of a company and mere fact that S. 92 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 did not make a mention of the alteration in the Articles of Association, did not detract from the fact that such alteration will be brought about and, therefore, S. 28 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 would be triggered in such circumstances.

2013 CLD 1432 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 21, 96 & 97Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997), S.33Alteration of memorandumReduction of share capital

Appellant company filed Form-A and Form-26, stating paid-up capital of the company as Rs.10 million divided into 100,000 shares of Rs.100 each

Company submitted an application stating that paid-up capital was incorrectly mentioned due to typing error and company's paid-up capital actually of Rs.10,000 constituting 100 shares of Rs.100 each

Company requested the Commission to rectify the mistake of paid-up capital

Request of the company was not accepted on the ground that it being matter of reduction of paid-up capital, same fell under jurisdiction of High Court in terms of Ss.96 & 97 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984

Contention of the company was that it was a typing mistake and not a matter of reduction of capital

Validity

Effect of rectification sought by the company, would be reduction of capital, and the power to reduce the capital, rested with the High Court

Alteration in memorandum could only be done in respect of the objects of the company stated in S.21(1)(a) to (g) of Companies Ordinance, 1984, which did not include alteration in the share capital of the company

Remedy had clearly been provided in Ss.96 & 97 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, whereby the High Court had the exclusive jurisdiction in the matter.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Alteration of memorandum", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942051

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Alteration of memorandum"

PLD 1967
16th May 1966

P L D 1967 Karachi 695

Miscellaneous Petition No. 11 of 1966

Court: High Court
CLD 2013
2013-March-22

2013 C L D 1432

SUCCESS INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus The REGISTRAR (SECP) — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
CLD 2017
2016-February-11

2017 C L D 1411

COBUSSEN PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LIMITED through Special Attorney and another — Petitioners Versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
CLD 2015
2014-July-8

2015 C L D 323

JAHANGIR SIDDIQUI & CO. LTD. through Chief Executive Officer — Plaintiff Versus HUM NETWORK LTD. through Chief Executive and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh
PLD 1964
Civil Original Matter No. 9 of 1964, decided on 27th April 1964.

P L D 1964 Dacca 666

Court:
PLD 1984
J. Miscellaneous Application No. 47 of 1983, decided on 2nd January, 1984.

P L D 1984 Karachi 225

Court:
PLD 1982
Civil Original No. 80 of 1981, decided on 4th April, 1982.

P L D 1982 Lahore 664

TAJ WOOLEN MILLS LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS, ASSISTANT OF OFFICE OF

Court:
CLD 2009
2008-October-24

2009 C L D 1

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS — Defendant

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PLD 2009
2008-October-24

P L D 2009 Federal Shariat Court 1

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS — Defendant

Court: High Court
PLD 1966
Appeal No. 5 of 1964, decided on 20th August 1965.

P L D 1966 Dacca 204

CHITTAGONG CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY‑Appellant Versus C. S. LTD.‑Respondent

Court: