Conditional leave to defend
Conditional leave to defend legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Defendant-appellant was granted conditional leave to defend the suit by furnishing bank guarantee equivalent to the decretal amount of Rs.10,00,000 with two sureties but he failed to comply with
Trial Court was left with no alternative but to decree the suit and that too, to the extent of principal amount
Order was perfectly in accordance with law and based on correct legal footings and well-founded
Appeal was dismissed by High Court.
"Conditional leave to defend", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942250
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conditional leave to defend"
2013 C L C 1471
Makhdoomzada ABDUL KARIM — Appellant Versus AJAB KHAN — Respondent
Court: Peshawar1983 C L C 2695
MESSRS NARUMAL JETOMAL AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus JUDGE OF THE SPECIAL COURT OF SIND AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2013 C L C 1669
MUHAMMAD TARIQ — Appellant Versus Malik BASHIR-UD-DIN and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2013 C L D 1701
MUHAMMAD TARIQ — Appellant Versus Malik BASHIR-UD-DIN through Attorney and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh1992 C L C 1964
SHER ALI AKHTAR and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Messrs HABIB BANK LTD. and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2005 M L D 851
Sh. MUHAMMAD IRFAN and others — Petitioners Versus SITARA COMMISSION SHOP and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 C L C 1747
MUHAMMAD IMRAN HAFEEZ — Petitioner Versus NAVEED ALI — Respondent
Court: Islamabad2025 C L C 1580
MUHAMMAD IRSALAN FARAZ — Petitioner Versus HABIB UL REHMAN — Respondent
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)1988 C L C 53
KHALID JAVED & COMPANY‑‑Petitioner Versus JAVED OIL INDUSTRIES (REGISTERED)‑‑Respondent.
Court: Lahore2024 C L C 610
MUHAMMAD MUZAMMIL through Attorney — Appellant Versus KHURRAM SAEED — Respondent
Court: Sindh