Home Maxims & Terms Duty of Executing Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Duty of Executing Court

Duty of Executing Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 CLC 644 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.XXI, R. 35(2)Execution of decreeDuty of executing court

Executing court cannot go beyond the decree and must execute it in its letter and spirit.

2025 CLC 644 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O.XXI, R. 35(2)Execution of decreeDuty of executing court

Executing court cannot go beyond the decree and must execute it in its letter and spirit.

2020 CLC 1311 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S.47Questions to be determined by the Court executing decreeDuty of executing courtScope

Executing court has to execute the decree as it is and cannot go beyond it.

2020 CLC 1311 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S.13DecreeEnforcement ofDuty of executing courtScope

Petitioner assailed order passed by executing court whereby he was ordered to pay, besides the decretal amount, an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- in light of an agreement between the parties

Contention of respondent was that the decree was passed on the basis of compromise between the parties and in the light of said agreement, it was agreed that if the petitioner, without any reason, would divorce the respondent, he would be bound to pay the said amount

Validity

Record revealed that the respondent was declared entitled to dower of Rs. 44,445/

Trial court had not declared that if the petitioner would divorce the respondent without any reason, she would be entitled to Rs.5,00,000/- in the light of said agreement

Executing Court had to execute the decree as it was and could not go beyond it

Executing court had travelled beyond the scope of the decree

Petition was accepted and the impugned order was set aside, in circumstances.

2015 CLD 464 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
O. XXI, R. 66Sale by auctionReserve price, fixation ofObject and purposeDuty of Executing Court

Wisdom behind enacting O.XXI, R.66, C.P.C. is that parties in execution proceedings should be treated alike and rights of decree-holder should not be preferred over the interest of judgment-debtor

Function of Executing Court is to execute decree but at the same time it is also duty of Executing Court to protect rights of judgment-debtor, which should not be jeopardized and scarified at the altar of execution of decree

Duty is caste upon Executing Court to determine reserve sale price of property as Executing Court is to safeguard interests and rights of judgment-debtor and ensure that properties are not sold at throw-away prices

"Reserve sale price" means market price of property.

2013 YLR 1890 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 47Objection petition against execution of decreeDuty of Executing CourtScopeDuty of court would be to ensure safe administration of justice while keeping in view substantial rights of parties

Pleas raised in objection petition could be decided only after framing of issues and recording of evidence.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Duty of Executing Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942269

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Duty of Executing Court"

CLC 2018
2017-April-5

2018 C L C 73

BAHADUR SHAH — Appellant Versus Contractor REHMAN SHAH — Respondent

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
CLC 2020
2019-October-15

2020 C L C 1311

MUHAMMAD MASOOM — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and another — Respondent

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
CLD 2003
2002-November-21

2003 C L D 914

Messrs NIZAMUDDIN & COMPANY and 4 others — Appellants Versus THE BANK OF KHYBER — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLD 2003
E.F.As. Nos.323 and 481 of 2001, heard on 2nd October, 2002.

2003 C L D 264

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus ALTOWFEEK INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED through Manager and Assistant

Court: Lahore
CLD 2003
E. F.A. No. 750 of 2001, decided on 1st October, 2002.

2003 C L D 280

MUHAMMAD SALEEM‑‑‑Appellant Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN and 12 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2008
2008-May-19

2008 C L D 1281

Rana MUHAMMAD IRFAN AKRAM and others — Appellants Versus ALLIED BANK LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1989
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1145 of 1988, decided on 11 th December 1988.

1989SCMR640

MUHAMMAD ALI and others — Petitioners Versus GHULAM SARWAR and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2007
Civil Revision No.1519 of 2005, decided on 12th April, 2007.

2007 Y L R 2582

Mst. BASHIRAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore .
CLC 2001
First Appeal from Order No.87 of 2001, heard on 9th May, 2001.

2001 C L C 2016

Maj. (Recd.) MAHMOOD HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED, FAISALABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2004
First Appeal from Order No. 69 of 1996, heard on 31st January, 2003.

2004 C L D 768

KASHIF YOUNAS ‑‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL SATTAR and another ‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore