Home Maxims & Terms Reliance for conviction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reliance for conviction

Reliance for conviction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 PLD 473 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 164 & 364Confessional statementRetractedReliance for convictionPrinciples

Retracted confession before a Magistrate can be the basis of convicting in a capital case however it must be; (a) voluntary i.e. without threat or inducement; (b) its object must be to state the truth; assistance for which can be ascertained from (i) whether the confession appears truthful within the context of prosecution case and (ii) whether there is any other evidence on record which tends to corroborate truthfulness of the confession, and (c) only minor irregularities regarding the rules concerning the recording of judicial confession can be permitted as determined on a case to case basis the main criteria being that such irregularities have not adversely affected the voluntariness or truthfulness of the confession

Slight delay in recording such confession after arrest of accused does not affect its legality and ability of Court to rely on it.

2013 YLR 1932 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Extra-judicial confessionReliance for convictionPrinciple

Three fold test is to be satisfied in order to use 'extra judicial confession' for recording conviction; firstly it was made; secondly it was voluntarily made; and lastly it was truly made

Extra-judicial confession is a weak type of evidence, which can easily be procured when direct evidence is not available

In order to rely upon such type of evidence, degree of high care and caution is required.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reliance for conviction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942270

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reliance for conviction"

PLD 2014
2013-November-7

P L D 2014 Peshawar 122

HAZRAT ALI SHAH — Appellant Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1997
Criminal Appeal No. 123 of 1993, decided on 23rd April, 1995.

1997SCMR392

MUHAMMAD ASLAM alias BODI‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLRN 2021
Criminal Appeal No.51-M of 2019, decided on 26th November, 2020.

2020 Y L R Note 90

MASTER ALI — Appellant Versus The STATE through A.A.G. and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)
PCRLJ 1999
Criminal Bail Application No. 927 of 1998, decided on 11th January, 1999.

1999 P Cr

Syed RASHID HUSSAIN and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
YLR 2012
Criminal Appeal No.361 of 2010, decided on 12th January, 2012.

2012 Y L R 1546

ABDUL LATIF — Appellant Versus SHERIN and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1995
Criminal Appeal No.91 of 1993, decided on 12th February, 1995.

P L D 1995 Lahore 505

ALTAF HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2013
Criminal Appeals Nos. 1815, 1898 and Murder Reference No.775 of 2006, decided on 22nd November, 2012.

2013 Y L R 1932

HUSNAIN HAIDER SHAH and others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2002
Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 1998, decided on 5th October, 2001.

2002 S C M R 261

KHADIM HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN SHAH and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2020
2019-December-18

P L D 2020 Sindh 473

ABDUL RAHEEM and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1994
N/A

1994 P Cr

ZAHID alias ZADDO — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore