Indivisible claim
Indivisible claim legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
During pendency of proceedings before Trial Court, one of the defendants died and subsequent thereto, suit was dismissed by Trial Court
Validity
Suit for damages was incompetent and not maintainable against defendant who had died during pendency of proceedings and prior to decree passed against him
Relief sought against defendant was indivisible and joint, therefore, suit in such circumstances was bound to abate collectively
High Court did not find any illegality in judgment and decree passed by Trial Court and suit of plaintiff was rightly dismissed
Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
"Indivisible claim", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942281
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Indivisible claim"
2013 M L D 1482
Dr. ABDUL RAZIQ and 2 others — Appellants Versus Mst. HAMEEDA BEGUM and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan1999 M L D 788
MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR, PROPRIETOR QADEER BROTHERS — Appellant Versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2001 P T D 925
RAJASTHAN STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX
Court: 242 I T R 4501977 S C M R 260
WAHAJUDDIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus Mst. RAZIA BEGUM AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Sched., Part I‑Transfer of house‑Question of divisibility of house‑beyond scope of writ jurisdiction‑House consistently held to be indivisible by all settlement authorities on basis of spot inspec tion and perusal of site plan‑R, only claimant displaced person infield, held, had a prior and preferential sight and was rightly transferred entire bungalow‑Review petition of opposite‑parries even if deemed to be pending on ground of a mete technicality, dismissal of review petition to face of finding of indivisibility, held, a foregone conclusion and its prosecution an exercise in futility ‑Writ.1986 C L C 490
FAZAL ELLAHI‑‑Appellant Versus DIWAN ALI and another‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1989SCMR115
Dr. AKHTAR ALI and another — Appellants Versus Haji MUHAMMAD SULEMAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1973 S C M R 192
ABDUL HAQUE AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1966 (W
Mst. FAZAL BIBI‑Petitioner Versus (1) Mehr IBRAHIM,
Court:P L D 1971 Lahore 401
ATTA MUHAMMAD‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus AHMAD BAKHSH AND 2 OTHERS Defendants‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1979 Supreme Court 826
A. K. NIAZI ETC.‑Petitioners Versus Sh. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL ETC. ‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan