Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Locus Poentientiae meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Locus Poentientiae

Locus Poentientiae legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLC(CS) 1125 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Principle of

Principle of Locus Poentientiae applies where certain vested rights accrue in favour of someone in furtherance of a valid legal order, however, the said principle would not arise in a situation when some benefit accrued due to an illegal order.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Locus Poentientiae", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942319

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Locus Poentientiae"

CLC 2000
Writ Petition No.5509 of 2000, heard on 5th April, 2000.

2000 C L C 1589

IQTADAR KARAMAT CHEEMA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE UNIVESITY OF THE PUNJAB through

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1983
Case No. 538/1470 of 1981, decided on 17th October, 1982.

1983 P L C (C

QASWAR ABBAS Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FAISALABAD AND 2 OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 2010
Civil Second Appeal No.1 of 2009, decided on 18th June, 2009.

2010 P L C (C

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, N.As. Gilgit and 4 others Versus Mst. KHALIDA KHANUM and 5 others

Court: Northern Areas Chief Court
PLC(CS) 2004
Civil Appeal No. 127 of 2003, decided on 12th December, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

CHAIRMAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARABAD and another Versus SAJJAD AHMED SHEIKH and 2 others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLC 2006
Writ Petition No.994 of 2004, decided on 28th June, 2005.

2006 C L C 60

Malik MUHAMMAD DIN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, GOVERNMENT

Court: Lahore
MLD 1993
Constitutional Petition No.D‑1228 of 1991, decided on 27th June, 1992.

1993 M L D 1112

Haji GHULAM MUHAMMAD SOOMRO‑‑‑Petitioner Versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION through its Mayor and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2008
Civil Petition No.645 of 2007, decided on 4th December, 2007.

2008 SCMR 544

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Government of Pakistan Establishment Division, Islamabad and another Versus Flt. Lt. FARRUKH RASHID (R) and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2000
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.68-K and 69-K of 2000, decided on 10th February, 2000.

2000 S C M R 907

ABDUL HAQUE INDHAR and others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2009
merits---Rule of merger was meant for computation of limitation period for filing of execution application whether impugned judgment before Appellate Court and Revisional Court remained under suspension or not or whether judgment of Trial Court was affirmed or modified by Appellate or Revisional Court---Relying on rule of merger, execution application was well within time notwithstanding the fact that Lower Appellate Court did not stay execution nor suspended judgment of Trial Court---As order of Executing Court whereunder execution application was allowed, was appealable, therefore, such time-barred application under S.3 of Limitation Act, 1908, amounted to nothing but to circumvent law and as such was not maintainable---High Court in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction set aside orders passed by two Courts below on application filed by judgment-debtors---Petition was allowed in circumstances

P L D 2009 Karachi 397

FEROZUDDIN and 11 others — Petitioners Versus MAZHAR HUSSAIN SHAH and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library