Home Maxims & Terms Admission of agreement meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Admission of agreement

Admission of agreement legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 SCMR 1600 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss.12 & 27(b)Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 17, 79 & 81Suit for specific performance of agreementTwo witnesses, non-production ofBona fide purchaser for value without noticeProofAdmission of agreementEffectPlaintiff sought execution of agreement to sell made by defendant in his favourSuit was dismissed by Trial Court and Lower Appellate Court but High Court decreed the same in favour of plaintiffValidityDefendant in his written statement admitted the agreement to sell in questionInitial onus to prove that subsequent transferee was bona fide purchaser, was on defendant

Father of subsequent transferee appeared as witness during trial and claimed that entire transaction/deal was initiated through him and that he knew about agreement to sell between plaintiff and defendant

Subsequent transferee, in circumstances, failed to discharge his initial onus with regard to plea/point and he was not entitled to protection of equitable doctrine

Supreme Court declined to interfere in judgment and decree passed by High Court

Appeal was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Admission of agreement", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942373

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Admission of agreement"

SCMR 2013
Civil Appeal No.418-L of 2012, decided on 13th June, 2013.

2013 S C M R 1600

ABBAS ALI — Appellant Versus LIAQAT ALI and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1985
Civil Revision No.271 of 1982, heard on 22nd February, 1984

1985 M L D 556

Syed FARHAT ALI — Petitioner Versus Syed ABBAS ALI SHAH and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2016
2016-May-13

2016 C L C 1478

AZIZ JAN — Petitioner Versus AYAZ and others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
PLD 2003
the basis of evidence--Neither the specific issues were framed on important mixed questions of law and fact nor the parties produced the evidence essential for decision of such questions without proper decision of which, there could be no effective adjudication of the dispute between the parties-- Supreme Court, while pointing out the important issues and aspects of the case to be noticed, remanded the case to the Trial Court to enable the parties to produce further evidence on all issues including the additional issues to be framed by the Trial Court on the questions raised by the Supreme Court

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 594

FAQIR MUHAMMAD and 8 others — Appellants Versus ABDUL MOMIN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2022
2022-March-24

2022 Y L R 2287

MUHAMMAD GHAFFAR and others — Petitioners Versus ARIF MUHAMMAD — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2015
2014-September-29

2015 C L C 107

DAD KARIM and 12 others — Appellants Versus ISHAQ and 20 others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
YLR 2014
Civil Revision No.874 of 2004, decided on 22nd April, 2014.

2014 Y L R 2321

KHUDA BAKHSH — Petitioner Versus ZAKIA KHATOON and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2007
R.A.No.249 of 1984, decided on 3rd June, 2005.

2007 Y L R 875

Haji ABDUL GHAFOOR through Legal Heirs — Applicants Versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT through Legal Heirs — Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2002
Civil Appeal No. 584 of 2000, decided on 11th October, 2001.

2002 S C M R 326

Mst. BASWAR SULTAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. ADEEBA ALVI‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2021
2020-October-7

2021 C L C 42

MEHAR ALI — Petitioner Versus KARIM BAKHSH (DECEASED) through L.Rs. and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)