Concurrent proceedings
Concurrent proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Complainant lodged F.I.R. against accused persons but during investigation police found all of them to be innocent and submitted challan against two co-accused persons declaring them to be the actual culprits
Subsequently complainant party, dissatisfied with police investigation, lodged private complaint against accused persons and also filed affidavits in favour of co-accused persons in the challan case, declaring them as innocent
Trial Court stopped proceedings in challan case and proceedings in private complaint were taken up and consequently accused persons were summoned
Accused persons filed application before Trial Court to stop proceedings in the private complaint and to initiate proceedings in the challan case, but same was dismissed
Validity
Case was of two versions
Police while discarding complainant's version as set forth in the F.I.R., introduced new culprits comprising of two co-accused persons with a new set of witnesses
Complaint case was to be taken up first in such circumstances
No legal infirmity was found in the order passed by the Trial Court
Revision petition was dismissed accordingly.
"Concurrent proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942393
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Concurrent proceedings"
P L D 1965 (W
THE STATE‑Appellant Versus ILLAHI BUX AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court:2007L2631
Mst. BAKHAN and 11 others — Petitioners Versus Mst. SADAN and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 M L D 1599
MUHAMMAD SAJJAD and others — Petitioners Versus RAB NAWAZ and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1976 Lahore 871
Major RIAZ AHMAD‑Appellant ~I Versus HAMID AZIZ SHEIKH AND 2 OTHERS
Court: ‑‑ Art. 204‑Contempt of superior Courts‑Collusive suit‑Ex‑lessee ,obtaining injunction frown Civil Judge through a friend and in garb of such order dispossessing Receiver appointed by High Court‑Business of canteen and ,cycle stand of cinema run by ex‑lessee and person filing civil suit and obtaining injunction from Court of Civil Judge only . ex‑lessee's helper and doing business on behalf of ex‑lessee‑Person obtaining injunction from Civil Judge having no interest in property .or its business, held, could not in circumstances act for protection of any of his interests but acted for protection of interest of ex 4essee‑Suit in Court of Civil Judge filed and possession taken over in collusion with ex‑lessee‑Ex‑lessee, held, guilty of contempt of High Court.‑Contempt of Court.2017 Y L R 1443
Syed IKRAMULLAH — Plaintiff Versus IQBAL AHMED KHAN and 4 others — Defendants
Court: Sindh2013 Y L R 2036
MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus Mst. KHATOON and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2024 C L D 1107
MEEZAN BEVERAGES (PVT.) LIMITED through duly authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2024 Lahore 615
MEEZAN BEVERAGES (PVT.) LIMITED through duly authorized officer — Petitioner Versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2017 P Cr
JANAN and others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2016 C L D 105
Show Cause Notice No. 11/2014 dated 22nd May, 2014
Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan