Propriety rights

If the authority had exercised jurisdiction vested in it by law, then the bar was applicable and if the authority had exercised jurisdiction not vested in it by statute, then the bar contained in the statute was not applicable

Plaintiffs-petitioners failed to show that the jurisdiction exercised by official defendants was not vested in them, hence, bar of jurisdiction was applicable and suit was not competent

Permission to file fresh suit could not enhance the limitation for filing suit

Under Art. 120 of the Limitation Act, 1908, for filing declaratory suit, the limitation was six years

Present suit was filed after six years from filing of earlier suit and the same was time barred

Plaintiffs-petitioners were bound to annex with revision petition, the certified copies of pleadings, complete evidence, orders and judgments/decrees

Due to non-filing of said documents the revision was not competent

Revision was dismissed.