Home Maxims & Terms Co-relation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Co-relation

Co-relation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 1575 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Void order""Illegal order"Co-relation

Every "illegal order" could not be said to be a "void order", however every "void order" would certainly be termed as "illegal order".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Co-relation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942427

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Co-relation"

PTD 2017
Civil Appeal No. 1338 of 2007, decided on 20th February, 2017.

2017 P T D 1514

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD Versus Messrs PAK SAUDI FERTILIZER LTD.

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2017
Civil Appeal No. 1338 of 2007, decided on 20th February, 2017.

2017 S C M R 706

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD — Appellant Versus Messrs PAK SAUDI FERTILIZER LTD. — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1984
Income‑tax Applications Nos. 663 and 664 of 1972, decided on 28th September, 1982.

1984 P T D 276

THE PRINTERS COMBINE (MERCANTILE) LTD, NAZIMABAD, KARACHI Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF IN OME‑TAX KARACHI, WEST KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 1998
Original Petition No. 15735 of 1994-S, decided on 26th February, 1996.

1998 P T D 2353

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus VENEERS AND LAMINATIONS (INDIA) LTD.

Court: 222 I T R 30
PTD 2003
Sales Tax Appeal No. K‑55 of 2002, decided on 19th March, 2002.

2003 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Customs, Central Excises and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2023
Special Customs Reference Application No.75 of 2022 and Constitution Petition No.D-2065 of 2022, decided on 16th November, 2022.

2023 P T D 710

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS through Deputy Collector of Customs and others Versus Messrs NETPAC and others

Court: Sindh High Court
PTD 1986
Reference Applications Nos. 28 & 29 of 1975, decided on 28th November 1985.

1986 P T D 84

STAR VACUUM BOTTLE MFG. COMPANY LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1998
Civil Appeal No.896 of 1996, decided on 16th March, 1998.

1998 S C M R 1153

KHALID WAHEED‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION and 12 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1984
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No, 652-R of 1983, decided pa 17th December, 1983,

P L D 1984 Supreme Court 188

GHARIB SHAH AND OTH$RS-Petitioners Versus ZARMAR GUL-Respondent

Court: S. 42(6)(7)(8)-Expression "Sanction of Mutation" not mentioned in . S. 31, N.-W. F. P. Pre-emption Act, 1950, and word "attestation" used in S. 31, N.-W. F. P. Pre-emption Act, 1950, not used in S. 42, West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967-Held, that did not mean that phrase "attestation of the sale" used in N.-W. F. P. Pre-emption Act, 1950, cannot be co-related to final order in that behalf to be passed under S. 42 (6) (7) (8) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967.-Interpretation of statutes.
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 447 of 1994, heard on 14th March, 1995.

1995 C L C 1310

MALIK ICE FACTORY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WAPDA‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore