Home Maxims & Terms Direction to investigating officer meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Direction to investigating officer

Direction to investigating officer legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PCrLJ 638 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 22-A & 22-BControl of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S. 9(c)Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionEx-Officio Justice of Peace, powers ofDirection to investigating officerPetitioners were accused facing proceedings under S. 9(c) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997

Petitioners were aggrieved of order passed by Ex-Officio Justice of Peace declining to issue direction to investigating officer for arraying respondent as accused and recording statement under S. 164, Cr.P.C.

Validity

Powers conferred on Ex-Officio Justice of Peace were not judicial, rather were ministerial

While dealing with applications under S. 22-A(6), Cr.P.C. Ex-Officio Justice of Peace could issue directions to concerned police officials for observance of all legal requisite formalities but he could not step into the shoes of investigating agency, which was independent in all respects, such matter related to investigating agency and not with Ex-Officio Justice of Peace

High Court declined to interfere in judgment/order passed by Ex-Officio Justice of Peace as the same was well reasoned and based on proper appreciation of facts and circumstances of the case

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

2013 PCrLJ 1603 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 22-A, 22-B, 4(1)(l), 156 & 157Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionDirection to investigating officer

Petitioner got criminal case registered against respondent and his grievance was that Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, in exercise of powers under Ss.22-A and 22-B, Cr.P.C. could not direct investigating officer to collect evidence in shape of mobile phone data

Validity

Ex-Officio Justice of Peace could not interfere in investigation or advice to collect evidence to investigating officer

Provisions of Ss.156 & 157, Cr.P.C. permitted only police officers to investigate a case, while remaining within the ambit of "investigation" as defined in S.4(1)(l), Cr.P.C.

Police officer was duty bound to investigate the matter, honestly, fairly and justly, so that truth could be brought to surface

Ex-Officio Justice of Peace had travelled beyond his jurisdiction under S.22-A, Cr.P.C., when he gave direction to investigating officer to collect mobile data

High Court set aside the order passed by Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, as the same was without jurisdiction and without lawful authority

Petition was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Direction to investigating officer", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942432

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Direction to investigating officer"

PCRLJ 1994
1994-January-22

1994 P Cr

MUHAMMAD JAMROZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2002
Constitutional Petition No. 15993 of 2001, decided on 9th October, 2001.

2002 Y L R 145

Mst. SAIMA ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2013
N/A

2013 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ASLAM HAYAT — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2010
2010-March-1

2010 P Cr

SAEEN BUX — Applicant Versus CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MATIARI and 9 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 2004
W.P. No.3040 of 2003/BWP, decided on 3rd November, 2003.

2004 Y L R 2291

MUREED HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2011
2010-August-17

2011 M L D 790

MUHAMMAD AMIR — Petitioner Versus GHULAM HUSSAIN — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2021
2020-October-7

2021 P Cr

QUTAB KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, D.I. KHAN and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (D. I. Khan Bench)
PCRLJ 2006
2005-December-15

2006 P Cr

Ch. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2025
2025-February-28

2025 P Cr

The STate through Prosecutor General Sindh — Applicant Versus Administrative Judge, Anti-Terrorism Courts, Clifton, Karachi thorugh Registrar, ATCs, Home Department, Karachi and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
YLR 2005
Writ Petition No.2220 of 2004, decided on 5th July, 2004.

2005 Y L R 848

TAHIRA YASMEEN and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, GHALLA MANDI, SAHIWAL and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore