Home Maxims & Terms Plea of right of private defence meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Plea of right of private defence

Plea of right of private defence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PCrLJ 1650 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 302(b), 109 & 100Qatl-e-amd, abetmentPlea of right of private defenceAccused persons in their statements recorded under Ss.340(2) & 342, Cr.P.C. had taken plea of right of self-defence

Putting the prosecution case and defence version in juxtaposition, defence version that it was the complainant party who launched attack on accused party, appeared to be probable which got support from the evidence of prosecution's own witness, who had noted three injuries, including two incised wounds on the head and right cheek of accused and two incised wounds and four injuries on the head to other accused

Accused persons, in circumstances, had the right of private defence of their bodies, which also extended to cause death of the assailants.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Plea of right of private defence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942434

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Plea of right of private defence"

SCMR 1994
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 355‑L of 1993, decided on 27th March, 1993.

1994 S C M R 1733

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2005
Cr. B.A. No.850 of 2004, decided on 24th January, 2004.

2005 Y L R 2350

MUHAMMAD ARIF — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 232 of 1965, decided on 20th March 1969.

P L D 1969 Dacca 991

TOTA MIA AND 9 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Opposite‑Party

Court:
MLD 2003
3rd February 2003

2003 M L D 1728

MOUR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2000
1999-April-9

2000 P Cr

ALI MUHAMMAD — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1968
Criminal Reference No. 161 of 1967, decided on 18th April 1967.

1968 P Cr

MOFIZUR RAHMAN CHOWDHURY‑1st Party Versus SERAJUL MOSTAFA AND OTHERS‑ 2nd Party

Court: Dacca
PCRLJ 1968
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2127 of 1968, decided on 18th July 1968.

1968 P Cr

ROSHAN DIN AND 4 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1987
Criminal Petition No. 302 of 1984, decided on 8th April, 1987.

1987 S C M R 1070

MUHAMMAD SHARIF and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/324/34‑‑Petition against conviction‑‑ Right of private defence‑‑Accused petitioner sustaining injuries during occurrence shown to be in possession of land in dispute‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine plea that right of private defence of person and property of petitioners stood established on record which extended to voluntary causing death of aggressors.‑ Private defence, right of.
PCRLJ 1989
Criminal Appeal No. 51 of 1987, decided on 31st May, 1988.

1989 P Cr

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1988
Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1987, decided on 6th July, 1987.

1988 P Cr

MUKARAM alias MULLA‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi