Home Maxims & Terms Government Analyst meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Government Analyst

Government Analyst legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PCrLJ 154 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 35Government AnalystScope

When the person who furnishes opinion and analyzing the samples is not qualified to be termed as Government Analyst under S. 35 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and Rules framed thereunder then such report, even if it be in positive, is of no avail to the prosecution as it cannot be relied upon.

2019 SCMR 930 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
R. 3Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S. 35NarcoticsGovernment analystQualifications

Concept of testing under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 ('the Act'), the establishment of the testing laboratories, tests and analysis and the report of the Government Analyst were premised on the assumption that the Government Analyst possessed the prescribed qualifications provided under S. 35 of the Act read with R. 3 of the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001 ('the Rules') which provided that the Government Analyst shall be a person who has a degree in Pharmacy or Pharmaceutical Chemistry or Medicine from a recognized University or of any other institution recognized by the Federal Government for such purpose and had not less than three years postgraduate experience in the test and analysis of drugs

Analysts who meet the said qualifications provided under the Act and the Rules must prepare these reports.

2015 MLD 518 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss.9(c) & 35Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, R.3Possession of narcoticsGovernment AnalystQualificationSubstance weighing 15 kilograms recovered from secret compartment of car driven by accused was alleged to be narcoticsTrial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him to imprisonment for lifeValidity

Narcotics substance was brought under processing from Forensic Science Laboratory report on 4-3-2009, while concerned officer was declared as Government Analyst on 5-8-2009 but with retrospective effect

Concerned declared Government Analyst lacked the required qualification as envisaged under S. 35 of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, read with Rule 3 of Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001

Most crucial issue of forensic verification of narcotics was not carried out in accordance with prescribed manner as provided there, under the provisions of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997

High Court set aside conviction and sentence recorded by Trial Court and remanded the case to Trial Court for decision afresh

Appeal was allowed accordingly.

2013 PCrLJ 1633 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 34, 35 & 36Government AnalystScope

Chemical Examiner or Assistant Chemical Examiner both when notified under Ss.34 & 35 of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, are considered to be Government Analyst as defined under S.36 of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Government Analyst", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942438

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Government Analyst"

PCRLJ 2020
2019-June-18

2020 P Cr

AMAN-UL-HAQ — Petitioner Versus STATE through Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 8 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 2020
2019-December-18

P L D 2020 Supreme Court 57

QAISER JAVED KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Prosecutor General Punjab, Lahore and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2018
Criminal Appeals Nos. 523, 524, 525, 494, 452, 51 of 2017, 22 of 2018 and Criminal Petition No. 94-Q of 2017, decided on 3rd October, 2018.

2018 S C M R 2039

The STATE through Regional Director ANF — Appellant/Petitioner Versus IMAM BAKHSH and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2015
2013-June-13

2015 M L D 518

AMAN UL HAQ — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2019
Criminal Appeal No. 94 of 2019, decided on 8th April, 2019.

2019 S C M R 930

KHAIR-UL-BASHAR — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 1999
N/A

1999 Y L R 870

RAB NAWAZ, S.H.O.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2020
2020-February-10

2020 M L D 1290

MUHAMMAD SAJID — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PCRLJ 2020
2019-August-20

2020 P Cr

GHULAM MUHAMMAD and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Balochistan
MLD 2022
2021-September-22

2022 M L D 1227

RASHID ZAMAN — Appellant Versus AFZAL AWAN, SHO POLICE STATION TAKHT-E-NASRATI, DISTRICT KARAK and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Bannu Bench)
YLR 2019
N/A

2019 Y L R 925

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD MUGHAL — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore