Substituting finding of fact

Such power under S.115, C.P.C. is primarily intended for correcting errors having been made and/or committed by subordinate court in exercise of its jurisdiction

While exercising jurisdiction under the provision of S.115, C.P.C. court cannot interfere merely just to substitute its findings on the question of fact

Under revisional jurisdiction courts normally do not re-evaluate evidence much less in absence of excess of authority, irregularity or misappreciation of evidence

No matter the decision howsoever erroneous, wrong or perverse, question of fact or law unless the decision falls within the scope of S.115, C.P.C. revisional jurisdiction cannot be invoked.