Home Maxims & Terms Nature of jurisdiction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Nature of jurisdiction

Nature of jurisdiction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 PLD 165 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss.27, 28 & PreambleConsumer CourtsNature of jurisdictionDuty of Consumer Court to determine its jurisdictionScope

Consumer Court established under the Punjab Consumers Protection Act, 2005 was not a court of general jurisdiction and it was duty of Consumer Court to examine allegations raised in a complaint before it in order to determine its jurisdiction in the matter

Vague and general allegations without raising any dispute about defective products or faulty services did not confer jurisdiction upon Consumer Court to adjudicate upon a matter and assume jurisdiction.

2013 CLC 1784 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 25Custody of minorNature of jurisdiction

Powers of Guardian Court with regard to custody of minor were in the nature of parental jurisdiction, and court must act in a way, a wise parent would do.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Nature of jurisdiction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942592

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Nature of jurisdiction"

SCMR 2004
Civil Petition No. 1452/L of 2003, decided on 6th July, 2004.

2004 S C M R 1638

Syed QADIR BAKHSH SHAH and others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DERA GHAZI KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1991
Civil AppeaTNo.175 of 1980, decided on 21st April, 1991.

P L D 1991 Sup me Court 985

Mian AKBAR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑‑ Appellant Versus Mst. AISHABAI and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLD 2004
Regular First Appeals Nos. 310 of 2002 and 712 of 2001, heard on 27th April, 2004.

2004 C L D 1465

Agha SAMIULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION through Managing Director and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1984
Suit No. 243 of 1983, decided on 7th March, 1984.

P L D 1984 Karachi 257

HABIB BANK LTD. AND 2 aTHt3Rs‑‑Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI PROPERTIES INVESTMENT Co. LTD. AND 4 oTHERS Defendants

Court: ‑‑ As amended by Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) (Amend ment) Ordinance (II of 1983)‑History of legislation and amendments therein with reference to practice during pre‑legislation period of Ordinances traced.
PTD 2017
S.C.R.A. No.230 and C.M.A. No.1601 of 2012, decided on 7th September, 2016.

2017 P T D 1201

Messrs EXPORT INTERNATIONAL through Proprietor Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Court: Sindh High Court
CLC 1993
F.RA. No. 1205 of 1987, heard on 24th March; 1992.

1993 C L C 1702

Shaikh MUHAMMAD AFZAL‑‑‑Appellant Versus VIRBAI through Legal Heirs‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 2017
I.T.R.A. No.60 of 2016, decided on 31st March, 2017.

2017 P T D 1211

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I Versus Messrs FAISALABAD OIL REFINERY MILLS (PVT.) LTD.

Court: Sindh High Court
PLD 2014
Objection Case Dairy No.8546 of 2014, decided on 12th February 2014.

P L D 2014 Lahore 436

Rana NAVEED AHMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary LG and CD — Respondent

Court:
CLC 2010
2010-June-8

2010 C L C 1921

GHULAM AHMAD — Petitioner Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2023
N/A

2023 C L D 1563

FAYSAL BANK LIMITED through Authorized Person — Appellant Versus Messrs USMAN ENTERPRISES and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore