Home Maxims & Terms Declaration of results meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Declaration of results

Declaration of results legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLD 675 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 224(4), 224(1), 224(2) & 199Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Ss. 42 & 108Bye-electionsConstitutional time frameDeclaration of resultsInterpretation of Art.224(4) of the ConstitutionTerm "election", connotation

Question before the High Court was whether there should be clear 120 days between the polling date for bye-elections and the date of expiry of Assemblies; or did the period of 120 days as stipulated under Art.224(4) began from the time of occurrence of the vacancy of the seat for which bye-election was to be held

Held, that Art.224(4) of the Constitution clearly stated that the period of 120 days started from the date of occurrence of vacancy

Minimum period of 120 days was required between the date of occurrence of vacancy and the date of expiry of the term of the Assembly and therefore, if a general seat fell vacant when the time between the date of occurrence of vacancy and the date of expiry of term of Assembly was less than 120 days, in such a situation, bye-elections could not be held under Art.224(4) of the Constitution

Hypothetically in a situation where the seat fell vacant on the 120th day before the date of expiry of the Assembly, under Art.224(4) of the Constitution bye-elections had to be held within sixty (60) days from the occurrence of the vacancy; and if the "election" was to cover the entire process culminating in a candidate being elected, the remaining period of 60 days was available for the returned candidate to sit in the Assembly and represent the constituency ; however, a closer look at Arts.224(1) & 224(2) of the Constitution read with S.42 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 showed that the term "election" did not include the time spent in the announcement of the election result for which an extra period of 14 days had been envisaged and therefore, a period of 74 days (60 plus 14 days) was spent on electing a candidate against a vacant seat and the remaining period for the returned candidate to sit in the Assembly and represent his constituency was therefore, reduced to 46 days (which was 120 days minus 74 days)

Constitutional mandate under Art.224(4) of the Constitution appeared to be that unless Forty-Six (46) days or more were available for a candidate to sit in the Assembly, bye-elections could not be held

Argument that 120 days must exist between the polling date and date when the term of the Assemblies expired, was fallacious and did not flow form the Constitution.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Declaration of results", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942603

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Declaration of results"

CLC 1988
Writ Petition No. 5578 of 1987, decided on 14th December, 1987‑.

1988 C L C 1992

AJMAL KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mirza KHALID BEG alias BILLA‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2018
2017-November-23

2018 M L D 1010

MUHAMMAD UZAIR — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary, Department of Health, Peshawar and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)
MLD 2005
2004-December-16

2005 M L D 825

Miss SUMERA IJAZ — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCAITON, RAWALPINDI — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2007
2006-May-29

2007 C L C 1035

MUHAMMAD HANIF — Appellant Versus ELECTION COMMISSIONER N.As. and others — Respondents

Court: Northern Areas Court of Appeals
SCMR 2006
Civil Petition No.2434 of 2005, decided on 27th September, 2005.

2006 S C M R 448

NASIR SIDDIQ and another — Petitioners Versus RETURNING OFFICER and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2002
Civil Fe ' ' n No.2664‑L of 2001, decided on 25th July, 2002.

2002 S C M R 1632

Dr. LIAQAT ALI KHAN and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER, DISTRICT SARGODHA and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2006
N/A

2006 Y L R 298

SHAHID AZIZ KIANI and another — Petitioners Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2020
2019-May-15

2020 M L D 29

AHSAN IFTIKHAR — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION through Chairman, Lahore and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1992
Writ Petition No. 560 of 1992, heard on 25th January, 1992.

1992 C L C 1009

TAJ DIN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

Court: Lahore
CLC 1986
Election Petition No.3 of 1985, decided on 23rd September,1985.

1986 C LC 2063

Syed INTIZAR HUSSAIN ZAIDI‑‑Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi