Home Maxims & Terms Right to pension meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Right to pension

Right to pension legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 SCMR 449 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 9 & 14EmploymentPensionRight to pensionEntitlement and scope

Pension is not a matter of bounty, charity, or benevolence, it is a right protected under Articles 9 and 14 of the Constitution and inseparably linked with the right to life, dignity and livelihood, for without sustenance in old age, these rights ring hollow

It should be taken more seriously for those public servants for whom it is a crystallized return on years of faithful service, a form of deferred wages earned through the sweat, labour, and loyalty of an employee

It embodies the principle that those who serve must not be cast aside in their twilight years

To deny or withhold pension is to strip a person of the security they have justly earned, leaving them exposed to indignity, vulnerability, and want

Therefore this right must be protected in the shape of the grant of pension that is not only adequate but also predictable

Moreover, an element of respect and empathy is to be maintained while granting pension which would be inconsonance with the values that our Constitution espouses with dignity as the highest constitutional value

The law itself stands as ashield to protect the rights of such employees, ensuring that long earned entitlements are not eroded by institutional caprice

To trifle with pension is, therefore, to trifle with constitutional justice itself.

2026 PLC(CS) 493 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 9 & 14EmploymentPensionRight to pensionEntitlement and scope

Pension is not a matter of bounty, charity, or benevolence, it is a right protected under Articles 9 and 14 of the Constitution and inseparably linked with the right to life, dignity and livelihood, for without sustenance in old age, these rights ring hollow

It should be taken more seriously for those public servants for whom it is a crystallized return on years of faithful service, a form of deferred wages earned through the sweat, labour, and loyalty of an employee

It embodies the principle that those who serve must not be cast aside in their twilight years

To deny or withhold pension is to strip a person of the security they have justly earned, leaving them exposed to indignity, vulnerability, and want

Therefore this right must be protected in the shape of the grant of pension that is not only adequate but also predictable

Moreover, an element of respect and empathy is to be maintained while granting pension which would be inconsonance with the values that our Constitution espouses with dignity as the highest constitutional value

The law itself stands as ashield to protect the rights of such employees, ensuring that long earned entitlements are not eroded by institutional caprice

To trifle with pension is, therefore, to trifle with constitutional justice itself.

2025 PLC(CS) 1462 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art.9Right to pensionScopeDenial of pension amounts to infringement of right to life

Pension is a right which the Government servants or employees in different positions and different capacities earn in terms of the relevant statutory provisions applicable to their case, mostly depending upon their length of service; and, in any case it is not a State bounty which could be awarded as a favour to any individual outside the scope of the applicable statute

Pension is integral to a retired employee's sustenance and dignity, and denial thereof amounts to infringement of the right to life under Article 9 of the Constitution.

2013 PLD 829 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Right to pensionScopeSuch right was neither absolute nor unqualified

Pension was not a bounty from the State/employer to the servant/employee, but it was fashioned on the premise and the resolution that the employee served his employer in the days of his ability and capacity and during the former's debility, the latter compensated him for the services so rendered

Right to pension had to be earned and for the accomplishment thereof, the condition of length of service was most relevant and purposive.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Right to pension", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942608

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Right to pension"

PLC(CS) 2024
C.P. No.D-2901 of 2022, decided on 23rd January, 2023.

2024 P L C (C

Qazi KHALID ALI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court
PLC(CS) 2019
Writ Petition No. 627-A of 2018, decided on 18th December, 2018.

2019 P L C (C

SHER AFZAL KHAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Elementary and Secondary Education Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court (Abbottabad Bench)
PLC(CS) 2025
Writ Petition No. 5260-P of 2024 (and other connected Petitions), decided on 7th April, 2025.

2025 P L C (C

Mst. MUSARAT Versus The GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLC(CS) 2021
C.Ps. Nos.883-L and 1791-L of 2020, decided on 9th February, 2021.

2021 P L C (C

The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Finance Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore and others Versus KANWAL RASHID and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2021
C.P. 883-L of 2020 and C.P. 1791-L of 2020, decided on 9th February, 2021.

2021 S C M R 730

The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Finance Department, Government of the Punjab, Lahore and others — Petitioners Versus KANWAL RASHID and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2013
2013-April-11

P L D 2013 Supreme Court 829

Constitution Petition No.127 of 2012; H.R.C. No.40927-S of 2012 and Civil Miscellaenous Appeal No.176/2012 in Constitution Petition No.Nil of 2012

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2014
Civil Appeals Nos.971 to 1012, 1013 of 2012, C.M.As. Nos.5314, 1014 to 1017 of 2012, 289-L, 386-L to 401-L of 2013, 61 to 223, 274 of 2014 and Civil Petitions Nos.1040-L, 1049-L, 1070-L of 2013, 46-L to 58-L, 92-L to 94-L, 106-L, 213-L, 219-L to 225-L, 239-L, 257-L, 277-L, 293-L, 307-L to 315-L and 330-L of 2014, decided on 31st March, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1336

SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT and 269 others — Appellants Versus M. ISMAIL TAYER and 269 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2015
Civil Appeals Nos.971 to 1012, 1013 of 2012, C.M.As. Nos.5314, 1014 to 1017 of 2012, 289-L, 386-L to 401-L of 2013, 61 to 223, 274 of 2014 and Civil Petitions Nos.1040-L, 1049-L, 1070-L of 2013, 46-L to 58-L, 92-L to 94-L, 106-L, 213-L, 219-L to 225-L, 239-L, 257-L, 277-L, 293-L, 307-L to 315-L and 330-L of 2014, decided on 31st March, 2014.

2015 P L C (C

SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT and 269 others — Appellants Versus M. ISMAIL TAYER and 269 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2020
N/A

2020 P L C (C

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through SECRETARY FINANCE, LAHORE and others Versus KANWAL RASHID

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2025
Civil Petition No. 616-K of 2025, decided on 10th July, 2025.

2025 P L C (C

PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Versus Mst. SORATH FATIMA and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan