Home Maxims & Terms Composition of Benches meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Composition of Benches

Composition of Benches legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 PLC(CS) 1308 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 3-APunjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.3-AKhyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), S.5Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (V of 1974), S. 3(3)Sindh Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules, 1974, Rr.23 & 24Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.212(1)(a), 9 & 184(3)Constitutional petition under Art.184(3) of the ConstitutionFederal and Provincial Service TribunalsComposition of BenchesGuidelines

Supreme Court observed that the Chairman should preferably constitute each bench comprising of one judicial/legal Member and one Member from civil service; that in such a situation, with reference to the disputes of civil servants, both (Members) could give their input on the judicial and executive sides, which would improve the quality of decision making and the judgments pronounced and strengthen the independence of judiciary in its role of enforcing the Fundamental Right of access to justice, and that where a single Member Bench was to be constituted, preference should be given to the judicial Member to hold the hearing.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Composition of Benches", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942614

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Composition of Benches"

SCMR 2013
Civil Petition No.1521 of 2012, decided on 15th November, 2012.

2013 S C M R 338

S.M. WASEEM ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M/O Housing and Works, Islamabad and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2008
28-9-2007 (PLD 2008 SC 30) fol

P L D 2008 Supreme Court 13

WAJIHUDDIN AHMED — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2000
Criminal Appeal No.72 of 1995/BWP and Murder Reference No. 12 of 1996/BWP, decided on 4th November, 1999.

2000 M L D 1928

RAHIM BAKHSH‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 1992
Civil Appeal No.3164 of 1991, decided on 14th August, 1991.

1992 P T D 250

DELHI COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: Supreme Court of India
SCMR 1997
Jail Petition for Leave to Appeal No.86 of 1995, decided on 28th November, 1995.

1997 S C M R 951

MUHAMMAD IRSHAD alias SHADA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2005
Appeals Nos.24 to 40 and 108 to 112 of 2003, decided on 12th August, 2003.

2005 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2000
Income-tax Reference No. 112 of 1987, decided on 15th September, 1998.

2000 P T D 1270

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Dr. D.A. IRANI

Court: 234 ITR 850
SCMR 1983
Civil Appeal No. 33 of 1977, decided on 24th May, 1982.

1983 S C M R 438

IQBAL MUHAMMAD AND Others-Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS AND Others-Respondents

Court: --S. 2-Scope of-Section 2, held, intended to cover not only com petency but also other forms of defects arising from improper exercise of powers of Chief Settlement Commissioner.-Interpretation of statutes.
SCMR 2015
Civil Appeal No.1000 of 2006, decided on 30th January, 2015.

2015 S C M R 1406

NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL — Appellant Versus IRFAN KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2016
2014-September-26

2016 C L D 560

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN — Appellant Versus HYDERABAD BEVERAGE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan