Examination of plaint
Examination of plaint legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Plaint under S.9 of the Ordinance must disclose a cause of action which spelled out the "default in fulfillment of any obligation with regard to any finance" and for this reason that S.9(2) of the Ordinance prescribed that the plaint must be supported by statement of account, which was applicable to both the parties i.e., customer and the financial institution
Additional requirement existed for the financial institution to get their statement of account certified under the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 and such requirement of the Statement of Account is to quantify the default complained of under the Finance Agreement(s) entered between the parties
Default or breach, arising out of the contract between the parties or in fulfillment of any obligation with regard to any finance, must be numerically quantified and reflected through the Statement of Account
Section 9(2) of the Ordinance further stated that the plaint shall be supported by all other relevant documents relating to the grant of finance.
Cause of action was the foundation of a law suit and was the totality of material facts which it was necessary for the plaintiff to allege and prove in order to succeed
Elements of a cause of action were: first, the breach of duty owing by one person to another; second the damage resulting to the other from the breach
"Cause of action" has been held from the earliest time to include every fact which is material to be proved to entitle the plaintiff to succeed, and every fact which a defendant would have a right to traverse
Test of "cause of action" was that if what the plaintiff stated was taken to be correct, did it entitle him to a relief or not in law
Cause of action meant the infringement of the right which furnished occasion for the action and must be antecedent to the institution of a suit and on the basis of it the suit must be filed
Plaint if it did not disclose a cause of action, a court will reject such a plaint
Plaint must, therefore, be pregnant with a lawful cause of action for the suit to progress and fructify
For court it would be meaningless and futile to proceed with a suit if upon examination the court found it to be devoid of any cause of action
Purpose of conferment of powers under O.VII, R.11, C.P.C. was to ensure that litigation which was meaningless and bound to prove abortive should not be permitted to occupy the time of the court
Obligatory upon the courts to judicially assess, ideally at the very beginning, if the plaint disclosed a "cause of action" and if it did not, reject the same without further ado.
Plaint under S.9 of the Ordinance must disclose a cause of action which spelled out the "default in fulfilment of any obligation with regard to any finance" and for this reason that S.9(2) of the Ordinance prescribed that the plaint must be supported by statement of account, which was applicable to both the parties i.e., customer and the financial institution
Additional requirement existed for the financial institution to get their statement of account certified under the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 and such requirement of the Statement of Account is to quantify the default complained of under the Finance Agreement(s) entered between the parties
Default or breach, arising out of the contract between the parties or in fulfilment of any obligation with regard to any finance, must be numerically quantified and reflected through the Statement of Account
Section 9(2) of the Ordinance further stated that the plaint shall be supported by all other relevant documents relating to the grant of finance.
"Examination of plaint", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942656
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Examination of plaint"
2005 M L D 280
BARKAT BIBI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. GAMAN BIBI and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2004 M L D 752
MUHAMMAD ANWAR CHAUDHRY — Petitioner Versus IMTIAZ BUTT and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2021 Y L R 1525
Ch. BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus Ch. SHOUKAT AHMAD and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)2003 C L D 856
NATIONAL ELECTRIC COMPANY OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED — Appellant Versus PRIME COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2026 Sindh 88
MUHAMMAD AMJAD — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Defence Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2003 C L C 1858
MUHAMMAD ABRAR — Petitioner Versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, GOJRA and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2020 C L C 792
AMEER ABBAS SIAL — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB — Respondent
Court: Lahore High Court2013 C L D 2005
GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. — Plaintiff Versus ASKARI BANK LTD. and others — Defendants
Court: LahoreP L D 2013 Lahore 716
GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. — Plaintiff Versus ASKARI BANK LTD. and others — Defendants
Court: High Court2025 C L C 937
Mst. NIMRA SHEIKH — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD UMAIR SIDDIQUI and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore