Joint agricultural land
Joint agricultural land legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Conversion of such land into a Housing Scheme by one co-sharer in possession and alienating same to extent of his own share while utilizing land of remaining co-sharers for roads and other amenities
No law existed to protect right of remaining co-sharers while seeking partition of such land over which a Housing Scheme or constructed property existed
High Court emphasized Legislative Authorities to frame suitable law(s) on such subject.
Assertion of independent right in respect of land in possession of plaintiff on basis of an oral family partition/settlement
Validity
Burden to prove family settlement would heavily lie on plaintiff
Mere such possession would not be sufficient to prove family settlement, if same was already under challenge before revenue authorities
Civil Court in cases of family partition of such land had no jurisdiction by virtue of S. 172(2)(xviii) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967.
"Joint agricultural land", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942665
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Joint agricultural land"
2021 M L D 1141
KHUDA-E-DAD and 15 others — Petitioners Versus BHAWAL KHAN and another — Respondents
Court: Balochistan (Sibi Bench)2021 M L D 531
Syed SHAHAN SHAH alias Syed Nasrullah Shah through Legal Heirs — Applicant Versus Syed AMANULLAH SHAH and 17 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)2016 P Cr
ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus GHULAM FARID and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2013 Y L R 2484
KANWAR MEHMOOD AHMED and others — Petitioners Versus Rao TAHIR ALI KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1998 M L D 1314
SARNAWAZ — Appellant Versus STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2016 M L D 1896
SHAH KARIM BAKHT and another — Petitioners Versus Mst. JEHAN ZEBA and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2003 S C M R 1864
BASHIR AHMED and 3 others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 6 others — Respondents
Court: ----Ss.3 & 5 as amended by Sindh Rural Credit and Transfer of Land (West Pakistan Amendment) Act (IV of 1963), Ss.3 & 4---Contract Act (IX of 1872), S.23---Alienation of land without sanction of Collector before amendment in Sindh Rural Credit and Transfer of Land Act, 1947 by virtue of West Pakistan Act IV of 1963---Effect---Such vendor (land-holder/debtor) could claim the benefit of embargo as provided under S.3 of Sindh Rural Credit and Transfer of Land Act, 1947, which saved his minimum holding of 300 acres or less without sanction of Collector---Such benefit accruing to vendor could be equated with vested right, which would remain operative even after repeal of or amendment in Sindh Rural Credit and Transfer of Land Act, 1947.P L D 1983 Peshawar 189
SALAHUD DIN IQBAI, — ‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZOHRA KHATOON AND 14 OTHERS-‑‑Respondents
Court: ---S. 2‑A‑"Evacuee"‑Legal definition of.‑Words and phrases.2005 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan