Home Maxims & Terms Memo of appearance meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Memo of appearance

Memo of appearance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 YLR 2517 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. III, R. 4Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42Suit for declarationAppointment of pleaderMemo of appearanceWakalatnamaScope

Memo of appearance was an undertaking to file proper power-of-attorney where for some reasons a duly signed power-of-attorney was not immediately procured

Such memo would only enable counsel to plead on behalf of a party for a particular hearing and he was yet to be authorized by the party to conduct all the proceedings

Order III, R. 4, C.P.C. expressly prohibited a counsel from appearance in the court without filing Wakalatnama duly signed by the party

Said Wakalatnama was deemed to be in force until all proceedings in the suit were ended or till such time the power-of-attorney was withdrawn or revoked

If counsel who filed memo of appearance failed to submit a proper power-of-attorney on the next date fixed, then court should issue fresh notice to the party concerned.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Memo of appearance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942669

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Memo of appearance"

PLD 2024
2023-November-28

P L D 2024 Sindh 339

KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION (K.M.C.) through Deputy Director, KMC — Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, IX AD&SJ, EAST, KARACHI and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2019
N/A

2019 C L C 2021

JALAL DIN — Petitioner Versus Mst. SALEEM BIBI and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2013
R.F.A. No.70 of 2012, decided on 26th July, 2013.

2013 Y L R 2517

Dr. ROIDAD SHAH and others — Appellants Versus M. ZAHOOR and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1981
First Appeal from Original Order No. 180 of 1980, decided on 2nd June, 1980.

1981 C L C 1066

GULAB SHAH‑Appellant Versus GHULAM HUSSAIN SHAH‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2004
Civil Appeal No. 18 of 2003, decided on 1st April, 2004.

2004 C L C 1236

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus NEELUM FLOUR MILLS through Managing Director‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLC 2021
2020-December-3

2021 C L C 684

Capt. UMER NAVEED PIRZADA — Petitioner Versus Rana ABDUR RAHEEM and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1990
Civil Appeal No.465 of 1986, decided on 16th May, 1990.

P L D 1990 Supreme Court 800

PAKISTAN through General Manager, Pakistan Railways — Appellant Versus Messrs O.M.R. EXPERT CONSULTANTS — Respondent

Court: ---S. 2(7), O. III, Rr.3 & 4, O.V, R.12, O.XXVII, Rr.2, 4 & 8-B---"Government Pleader"---Definition---"Government pleader" includes any officer appointed by the Provincial Government to perform all or any of the functions expressly imposed by Civil Procedure Code on the Government pleader and also any pleader acting under the directions of the Government pleader---Government pleader or anybody appearing on behalf of the Government or even on behalf of a private party can receive the process on behalf of his client ---Factum that an Advocate appearing for a private party has to file a Vakalatnama, whereas an Advocate appearing on behalf of a Government has to put in memo of appearance does not alter the status of the Advocate being agent for accepting the process or for continuing to appear in the case till the time under 0.111, R.4(2), C.P.C. the Vakalatnama or the memo of appearance is withdrawn with the permission of the Court---Word "document" appearing in O.III, RA(l) is of wide connotation and includes a Vakalatnama as well as memo of appearance which is filed by an Advocate on behalf of a Government pleader.--Words and phrases.
PLD 2005
20th June 2005

P L D 2005 Karachi 560

THE STATE through Pakistan Coast Guard, Karachi and others — Appellants Versus SHERIN KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1988
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.2-Q of 1988, decided on 29th May, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1830

through Secretary Board of Revenue, Baluchistan — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, QUETTA

Court: High Court
MLD 1991
N/A

1991 M L D 2227

Mst. NASREEN MAHMOODA — Petitioner Versus MUMTAZ IMRAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore