Challan put in court
Challan put in court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Mere fact that challan was complete or put in court could not by itself be considered a good ground for refusing bail to the accused, if otherwise his case was found fit for grant of bail.
"Challan put in court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942674
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Challan put in court"
1987 P Cr
MUHAMMAD ZADA alias DILDAR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1979 SCMR 508
DIN MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE ETC.‑Respondents
Court: High Court2013 Y L R 2642
RAHIM SHAHID — Petitioner Versus The STATE through A.A.-G. and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1980 S C M R 920
SHABBIR AHMAD-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: ---S. 497-Bail-Plea of alibi-Prosecution witnesses named in F. I. R. supporting plea of alibi taken by petitioner--Petitioner directed to be released on bail, in circumstances of case- Alibi.1978 S C M R 183
MUHAMMAD GULSHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD INAYAT AND ANOTHER -Respondents
Court: ---Ss. 506, 148, 149, 188 & 324 read with Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 561-A-Quashment of criminal proceedings Criminal Courts not concerned with questions of title to property Petitioners prosecuted for offences allegedly committed by them under S. 506 etc. calling for necessary inquiry into them-High Court, held, justified in circumstances of case to hold allegations in F. I. R. having puma facie disclosed a case for prosecution of petitioner and prosecution could not be stifled by quashment of proceedings. Qusahment of proceedings.1977 S C M R 474
MUHAMMAD IQBAL ZAFAR‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑ S. 498‑Bail‑Accused appellants Government servants and no sanction for their prosecution obtained ‑ About 70 prosecution witnesses to be examined in case and involving huge record‑Accused already in lock‑up for sufficient time‑‑Trial before Special Judge likely to take years to complete‑Case, held, fit for allowing bail. Bail.1996 P Cr
GHULAM QASIM — Petitioner Versus NAZIR AHMAD and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1985 M L D 1376
ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus ALLAH DITTA and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1980 P Cr
NAZAR MUHAMMAD‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE AHD 6 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1979 S C M R 471
Rai ATA ULLAH KHAN‑Petitioner Versus Raja ANAR KHAN AND OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court: High Court