Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Construction work meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Construction work

Construction work legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 MLD 1759 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Ss. 44 & 15Writ petitionEquality before lawAffidavitConstruction workPrice adjustmentPrice adjustment was denied to be paid to the petitioners/contractors by the DepartmentOther contractors had been paid the subject amountRefusal to pay lawful dues was not justifiedPetitioners were being treated with discrimination

Writ petition was supported with affidavit but the respondents who had to make payment neither appeared nor filed written statement or counter affidavit

Writ petition supported by affidavit could be rebutted only by filing counter affidavit

Writ petition was accepted and Authority was directed to pay all the dues according to price adjustment formula.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Construction work", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942683

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Construction work"

SCMR 2012
Civil Appeal No.2782 of 2006 and Civil Petition No.2564-L of 2002, decided on 18th May, 2012.

2012 S C M R 1428

FARID COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. and others — Appellant/Petitioner Versus VICE-COMMISSIONER, PESSI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 2003
N/A

2003 P L C 80

NESTLE MILK PACK (PVT.) LTD. through Secretary Versus VICE‑COMMISSIONER, PESSI, HEAD OFFICE, LAHORE and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1999
Civil Appeals Nos.2544 and 2545 with 642 to 648 of 1989, decided on 18th December, 1998.

1999 P T D 3165

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus BOKARO STEEL LTD

Court: 236 I T R 315
YLR 2010
Civil Revision Application No.55 and C.M.A. No.330 of 2008, decided on 15th April, 2009.

2010 Y L R 43

HASAN QAMAR ARIF — Applicant Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 2001
Tax Cases Nos.315 and 316 of 1986 (References Nos. 193 and 194 of 1986) decided on 5th August, 1997.

2001 P T D 2788

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus HARIDAS BHAGATH & CO. (P.) LTD.

Court: 240 I T R 169
PTD 2001
I. T. R. No. 196 of 1993, decided on 9th August, 1999.

2001 P T D 3571

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus UNIT CONSTRUCTION CO. (PVT.) LTD.

Court: 240 I T R 718
YLR 2010
Writ Petition No. 6008 of 2009, decided on 18th May, 2010.

2010 Y L R 2676

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR — Petitioner Versus D.C.O. and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1995
Civil Appeals Nos. 34‑K and 35‑K of 1992, decided on 10th June, 1992.

1995 S C M R 339

Dr. MA. MAHBOOB and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mrs. NAWAB BEGUM‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1987
Service Appeal No. 28 of 1984, decided on 19th November,1986

1987 P L C (C

JAVAID RIZVI Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN through Services and General Administration Department and another

Court: Service Tribunal Baluchistan
YLR 2022
2020-September-30

2022 Y L R 565

MUJAHIDABAD WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION JUTAL through Members — Petitioners/Plaintiffs Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library