Home Maxims & Terms Provincial sales tax meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Provincial sales tax

Provincial sales tax legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 1285 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(22A), 7, 2(20)(c) & 2(4)Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionInterpretation of Ss. 2(22A) and 7 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990Provincial sales taxAdjustment of provincial input tax by the taxpayer under S. 7(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990Specific nature of right of adjustment of input taxDetermination of sales tax liabilityPetitioner / taxpayer impugned denial of input tax adjustment on provincial sales tax paid by petitioner

Such adjustment was denied to the petitioner by the Department on the ground that notwithstanding promulgation of provincial sales tax law in three Provinces, the same were not recognized as provincial sales tax law for the purpose of input tax adjustment by the Department

Department further contended that S. 2(22A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 provided a discretion to decide as to which provincial sales tax should be allowed for adjustment of input tax under S. 7 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990

Held, that basic right of the petitioner was provided under S. 7(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 wherein taxpayer was entitled to adjustment of input tax from their output tax for a given tax period

Sales Tax Act, 1990 had clearly defined input tax under S. 2(14) and output tax under S. 2(20)(c) to mean provincial sales tax levied on services rendered or provided to the person

Section 2(22A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 defined provincial sales tax to mean tax levied under provincial laws which meant provincial sales tax as promulgated in any or all of the Provinces of Pakistan and further defined that for purposes of the Islamabad Capital Territory, provincial sales tax would be that which was declared by the Federal Government to be a provincial sales tax for purposes of input tax adjustment, which declaration was required in the Official Gazette only for the purpose of Islamabad Capital Territory

Respondent Department, in the present case, had assumed under the cover of S.2(22A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 a discretionary power to decide as to which provincial sales tax should be allowed for input tax adjustment, and such discretion had the effect that S. 7 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 had become subject to the discretion of the Department and the Federal Government; which clearly was not within the scheme of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which on the contrary, provided a specific right of adjustment of input tax

Section 2(22A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 could not be used to deny the right of input tax adjustment by a declaration in the Official Gazette

High Court directed the Department to accept sales tax return filed by the petitioner by allowing adjustment claimed by the petitioner of provincial sales tax on services under provincial laws

Constitutional petition was allowed, accordingly.

2013 PTD 2048 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.3Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 165, 165-A & 199Constitutional petitionProvincial sales taxTaxable servicesExemptionCivil Aviation Authority contended that it was a statutory body and not liable to pay provincial sales tax on servicesValidity

Terms "income" and "property" as used in relation to taxation in Art.165 of the Constitution, were to be given broad meaning and the same were not confined to narrow and strict meaning

Inter-governmental immunity granted by Art. 165 of the Constitution was lifted in relation to provincial entities in respect of income tax by Art.165-A of the Constitution, expressly provided therein and by extension thereof in relation to federal sales tax

Provincial sales tax levied by and under Sindh Sales Tax on Services Act, 2011, was within the broad meaning to be given to "income" in Art. 165 of the Constitution

Inter-governmental immunity from provincial sales tax was available to Civil Aviation Authority, just as immunity from octroi was available to Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation

Civil Aviation Authority was not liable to pay tax under Sindh Sales Tax on Service Act, 2011, and all demands made, proceedings initiated, orders passed or notices issued to the Authority by Provincial Government were quashed and set aside

Petition was allowed accordingly.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Provincial sales tax", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124942760

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Provincial sales tax"

PTD 2014
Writ Petitions Nos.28287, 28917, 31630, 29398, 29404, 39408, 30625, 31964, 29402, 30070, 29473, 28920, 29712, 29707, 28356, 28354, 28355, 30617, 31629, 31429, 30060 and 31390 of 2013, 430, 2604, 634, 1401, 1196, 313, 2392, 500, 1941, 999, 3894, 5505, 5288, 5292, 5496, 4700 and 5643 of 2014, decided on 7th March, 2014.

2014 P T D 1285

TREET CORPORATION LTD. through Company Secretary and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2024
Constitutional Petitions Nos.819 and 1312 of 2020, decided on 27th November, 2023.

2024 P T D 331

Messrs CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN through Authorized Representative and others Versus The GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary and others

Court: Balochistan High Court
PTD 2015
Complaint No.280/KHI/ST(132)/1002/2013, decided on 5th August, 2013.

2015 P T D 371

Messrs MIMA KNIT (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 2017
S.T.R. No.21 of 2016, decided on 10th May, 2017.

2017 P T D 1485

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus Messrs GOLDEN PEARL COSMETICS

Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)
PTD 2013
Complaint No. 19/KHI/ST (03)/56 of 2013, decided on 2nd May, 2013.

2013 P T D 1545

Messrs LOTTE PAKISTAN (PTA) LTD. Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 2013
C.P. No.D-2643 of 2012, decided on 10th July, 2013.

2013 P T D 2048

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF PAKISTAN through Airport Manager Versus SINDH REVENUE BOARD through Chairman and 2 others

Court: Sindh High Court
PTD 2017
S.T.A. No.11/PB of 2014, decided on 17th September, 2014.

2017 P T D (Trib

Messrs FORVIL COSMETICS MINGORA SWAT Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO, PESHAWAR

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2019
Writ Petition No. 131594 of 2018, decided on 3rd April, 2018.

2019 P T D 1534

MUHAMMAD USMAN QAYYUM Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2021
Intra Court Appeal No.115 of 2019 in Writ Petition No.2349 of 2017, decided on 21st January, 2021.

2021 P T D 1124

OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED, OGDCL, ISLAMABAD Versus Messrs SPRINT OIL AND GAS SERVICES PAKISTAN FZC, ISLAMABAD

Court: Islamabad High Court
PTD 2021
Constitutional Petitions Nos.D-4651, D-4652, D-4653, D-4654, D-4655, D-4656, D-4657, D-4658, D-4659, D-4660 and D-4661 all of 2014, decided on 27th October, 2020.

2021 P T D 1187

Messrs SHIELD CORPORATION LIMITED through Assistant Financial Controller Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Finance Division, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court