Home Maxims & Terms Appeal to the Supreme Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Appeal to the Supreme Court

Appeal to the Supreme Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 SCMR 306 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 10 & 305Winding up order or any order passed or decision made by the Company Judge after the winding up of a companyAppeal to the Supreme CourtScope

Section 10(1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 provided that it applied to a winding up order as well as any order or decision made in the winding up proceedings after a company had been ordered to be wound up

Resultantly, a winding up order as well as any order passed or decision made by the Company Judge after the winding up of a company should be appealable before the Supreme Court instead of the Division Bench of the High Court. [Ibrahim Shamsi v. Bashir Ahmed Memon (2005 SCMR 1450) held to be good law; Kamaluddin Qureshi v. Ali International Company (PLD 2009 SC 367) overturned].

2019 CLD 227 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 10 & 305Winding up order or any order passed or decision made by the Company Judge after the winding up of a companyAppeal to the Supreme CourtScope

Section 10(1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 provided that it applied to a winding up order as well as any order or decision made in the winding up proceedings after a company had been ordered to be wound up

Resultantly, a winding up order as well as any order passed or decision made by the Company Judge after the winding up of a company should be appealable before the Supreme Court instead of the Division Bench of the High Court. [Ibrahim Shamsi v. Bashir Ahmed Memon (2005 SCMR 1450) held to be good law; Kamaluddin Qureshi v. Ali International Company (PLD 2009 SC 367) overturned].

2014 SCMR 45 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 67(3) & 67(1)Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 62 & 63Decision of Election TribunalAppeal to the Supreme CourtAdjudication of such appeal by the Supreme CourtScope

Adjudication in appeal proceedings by the Supreme Court at the apex level was distinct and different from decision/findings of Domestic Tribunals, not because of hierarchy but because of the statutory powers available to an appellate court under S.67 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976

Adjudication of an issue, which was a continuous bone of contention between the parties could not be postponed even if there was a lapse of a period of 10 years ; and particularly when a candidate had to prove his/her credentials in terms of Arts. 62 & 63 of the Constitution to establish that no objection/attack was actionable against him or her, both before as well as after entering the Parliament or the Provincial Assembly

Court could intervene in the election of such candidates, who were found to be disqualified, even after having been elected as members of Parliament, and their election could subsequently be de-notified.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Appeal to the Supreme Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944288

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appeal to the Supreme Court"

PLD 1958
Civil Appeal No. 5‑D of 1957

P L D 1958 Supreme Court (Pak

THE PROVINCIAL LIBRARY‑ — Appellant Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, EAST PAKISTAN‑ — Respondent

Court: (a) Income‑tax Act (XI of 1922), S. 66‑A (2)‑Appeal to Supreme Court--‑Competence‑Question to be decided solely on terms of S. 66‑A (2)--‑Civil Procedure Code (11 of 1908), Ss. 109 & 110‑Letters Patent (Dacca), Cl. 39‑Feroze Shah v. Income‑Tax Commissioner Punjab cd N.‑W. F, P. A I R 1931 Lah. 138 wrongly decided.
PLD 1961
8th September 1959

P L D 1961 Dacca 490

PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN‑Petitioner Versus MOHIUDDIN MOLLA AND OTHERS‑Opposite‑Parties

Court: High Court
PTD 1963
Supreme Court Petitions Nos. 141, 509, 510 and 571 of 1962, decided on 24th April 1963.

1963 P T D 867

HARJINA & Co. (PAK.) LTD., KARACHI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL) KARACHI

Court: Karachi Pakistan
PTD 1999
C.M.P s. Nos.4337 and 4354 of 1995 in I.T.Rs. Nos. 106 and 167 of 1983, decided on 9th July, 1996.

1999 P T D 2114

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus Late S.M. SYED MUHAMMAD and others

Court: 226 I T R 824
PLD 1960
Applications for Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court Nos. 28 and 29 of 1957, decided on 25th March 1938.

P L D 1960 Dacca 750

Haji BADI AHMED‑Petitioner Versus UNITED BANK OF INDIA LTD. AND OTHERS‑ — Opposite‑Parties

Court:
PTD 2002
Civil Appeals Nos.1936 to 1943 of 2000, decided on 7th November, 2001.

2002 P T D 430

Messrs PRIME DAIRIES ICE CREAM LTD., LAHORE Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COMPANIES ZONE

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1993
Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 30235 and 32096 of 1989 in I.T.Rs. Nos. 152 and 153 of 1985, decided on 25th January, 1990,

1993 P T D 104

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus KERALA STATE DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. (N0.2)

Court: Kerala High Court (India)
PLD 2014
2014-June-24

P L D 2014 Lahore 574

TALIB HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2002
Civil Appeals Nos:1936 to 1943 of 2000, decided on 7th November, 2001.

2002 S C M R 540

Messrs PRIME DAIRIES ICE CREAM LTD., LAHORE‑‑‑Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, COMPANIES ZONE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2001
Civil Appeal No. 10360 of 1996 with Civil Appeals Nos. 145 to 149 of 1997, decided on 1st August, 2000.

2001 P T D 2421

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX and others Versus RANCHI CLUB LTD

Court: 247 I T R 209