Home Maxims & Terms Delayed sanction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Delayed sanction

Delayed sanction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PCrLJ 265 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 417Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 420, 468 & 471Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5Cheating; forgery for purpose of cheating; and using as genuine a forged documentAppeal against acquittalDelayed sanctionCondonation of delayPlea raised by authorities that delay had been caused due to lengthy procedure of sanction from concerned quartersValidityProvision contained in special law prevailed upon provision contained in general law

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, having been provided limitation, provisions of Limitation Act, 1908, could not be invoked

Appeal filed after expiry of 30 days was barred by time and there was no justification that leniency should be shown in case of appeal filed by State

Court of law could not adopt a different yardstick for the State, in case of limitation

Appeal was time barred and no justification was shown by the State for condonation of delay

Double presumption of innocence was attached to order of acquittal passed by a Court of competent jurisdiction and in extraordinary cases, where judgment was found to be perverse, shocking or suffering from error of jurisdiction, Appellate Court could interfere

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Delayed sanction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944341

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Delayed sanction"

PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. MN‑13 of 1984, decided on 10th March, 1984.

1984 P L C 1312

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MULTAN Versus Mst. ANWAR BIBI

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
CLC 2019
2018-March-15

2019 C L C 1972

The AGRICULTURAL AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD TARIQ JAVED and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PCRLJ 2014
2013-September-11

2014 P Cr

STATE through Advocate-General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar — Appellant Versus WAHID — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2023
N/A

2023 Y L R 2278

Mst. AKBARI BEGUM and others — Petitioners Versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2019
2018-March-26

2019 M L D 1124

UTILITY STORES CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through Regional Manager — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1996
Suit No 420 of 1994, decided on 28th November, 1995

P L D 1996 Karachi 192

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ‑‑‑ Plaintiff Versus SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION and 4 others ‑‑‑ Defendants

Court:
PLD 1966
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 188 of 1962, decided on 2nd February 1965.

P L D 1966 (W

THE STATE‑Appellant Versus A. G. SHEIKH AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2005
N/A

2005 M L D 803

PAKISTAN through SECRETARY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, RAWALPINDI — Appellant Versus Mian ABDUL WAHEED — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1971
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1650 of 1970, decided on 7th October 1970.

1971 P Cr

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2004
Complaint No.C-1269-K of 2002, decided on 14th December, 2002.

2004 P T D 235

Messrs U.S. APPARELS AND TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman