Prosecution by Commission
Prosecution by Commission legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Grievance of petitioner was that instead of taking penal action against broker, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, transferred his complaint for arbitration on the claim
Validity
Discretion vested with Securities and Exchange Commission under S.29 of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997, was to be exercised with caution by applying yardstick for examining every case on its own merits
Specific allegation of non-provision of documents and loss of billions of Rupees could not be treated in causal manner and could not be set aside by taking the stance that it would open floodgate of such complaints
Function of the Commission was not of mere post office but of an agency, under duty, to conduct prosecution of offences in fit cases and such fitness could only be determined through investigation/inquiry, conducting a speaking order
Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, on receipt of complaint was duty bound to conduct preliminary inquiry for ascertaining as to whether any offence falling under S.17 of Securities and Exchange Ordinance, 1969, was prima facie made out or not
In case offence was made out, the Commission should have itself proceeded with the same in terms of Ss.29 & 38 of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997
After preliminary probe, if the complaint did not find trace of such violation/offence, it could be referred to alternate dispute resolution by treating same as a dispute complaint
High Court set aside the action of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan sending complaint of petitioner for arbitration, as the same was unjust and improper
High Court directed Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan to proceed with complaint of petitioner
Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Prosecution by Commission", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944344
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prosecution by Commission"
2014 C L D 83
Haji SAIF ULLAH KHAN BANGASH — Petitioner Versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2011 P L C (C
Ch. AMJAD HUSSAIN and 17 others Versus PUBLIC PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT through Prosecutor-General, Punjab and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court2023 Y L R 882
The CHAIRMAN, NAB through Prosecutor General Accountability — Appellant Versus AHMED and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2020 C L C 2037
Dr. SHEERAZ-UR-REHMAN and others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary and others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1957 Supreme Court (Ind
DHARMANAND PANT‑Appellant Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2016 Peshawar 175
JAVED AKBAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2015 Y L R 1746
SOOBAL and another — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: SindhP L D 2010 Supreme Court 841
ABID IQBAL HAFIZ and others — Petitioners Versus SECRETARY; PUBLIC PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1982 P T D 80
SOUTH ASIA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI (CENTRAL)
Court: Delhi High Court (India)P L D 1959 (W
MANZUR AHMED and another‑Convict‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: