Home Maxims & Terms Imposition of taxes meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Imposition of taxes

Imposition of taxes legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 PTD 509 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 25, 42 & Third Schedule, Part-IIIImposition of taxesTehsil Municipal Administration, powers of

Petitioner was owner of stone crusher plant and was aggrieved of levy of tax/fee by Tehsil Municipal Administration on transportation of sand and crushed stone

Validity

Business of petitioner was not regulated by any of the local government either under provisions of erstwhile North Western Frontier Province Local Government Ordinance, 2001 or Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013

Petitioner placed on file, decision taken by Local Government Council regarding imposing of tax by Tehsil Municipal Officer on mineral products which tax was declared to be not in accordance with Third Schedule, Part-III of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013

When decision was taken regarding one district, then same was equally applicable to similar activities being carried out in another district

Activities being carried out by petitioner were at par regarding which decision had been taken earlier

High Court declared that Tehsil Council had no authority to levy any tax/fee on production of stone, sand/bajri

High Court declared notification in question as without lawful authority

Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances.

2019 CLC 298 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 25, 42 & Third Schedule, Part-IIIImposition of taxesTehsil Municipal Administration, powers of

Petitioner was owner of stone crusher plant and was aggrieved of levy of tax/fee by Tehsil Municipal Administration on transportation of sand and crushed stone

Validity

Business of petitioner was not regulated by any of the local government either under provisions of erstwhile North Western Frontier Province Local Government Ordinance, 2001 or Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013

Petitioner placed on file, decision taken by Local Government Council regarding imposing of tax by Tehsil Municipal Officer on mineral products which tax was declared to be not in accordance with Third Schedule, Part-III of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013

When decision was taken regarding one district, then same was equally applicable to similar activities being carried out in another district

Activities being carried out by petitioner were at par regarding which decision had been taken earlier

High Court declared that Tehsil Council had no authority to levy any tax/fee on production of stone, sand/bajri

High Court declared notification in question as without lawful authority

Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances.

2014 PTD 225 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Arts.73, 184, 199 & Fourth Schedule, Entry No. 47Imposition of taxesJudicial reviewPrinciples

Legislature has vast powers to levy and impose tax on income of persons, pursuant to Entry No.47 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule to the Constitution and to prescribe tax rates thereon by introducing Bill in terms of Art. 73 of the Constitution

Such legislation has to undergo test of Constitutional constraints

Legislative competence of imposing taxes is also subject to scrutiny by High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution and by Supreme Court under Art. 184 of the Constitution, particularly if a levy or enactment has been challenged for being discriminatory, confiscatory or violative of fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Constitution

Concept of absolute authority to impose tax by rulers on their subjects, without having any representation of people in such legislation, is no more available under the Modern Democratic System of Governments, which are run by elected representatives of people under their respective Constitutions

Unbridled powers and authority to impose tax arbitrarily, without having any rationale or reasonableness, is now being regulated under Constitutional restraints, whereby taxes are to be imposed reasonably, without discrimination and in such manner that those may not encroach upon fundamental rights of a person as guaranteed under the Constitution.

2014 PLD 48 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Arts.73, 184, 199 & Fourth Schedule, Entry No.47Imposition of taxesJudicial reviewPrinciples

Legislature has vast powers to levy and impose tax on income of persons, pursuant to Entry No.47 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule to the Constitution and to prescribe tax rates thereon by introducing Bill in terms of Art.73 of the Constitution

Such legislation has to undergo test of Constitutional constraints

Legislative competence of imposing taxes is also subject to scrutiny by High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution and by Supreme Court under Art.184 of the Constitution, particularly if a levy or enactment has been challenged for being discriminatory, confiscatory or violative of fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Constitution

Concept of absolute authority to impose tax by Rulers on their subjects, without having any representation of people in such legislation, is no more available under the Modern Democratic System of Governments, which are run by elected representatives of people under their respective Constitutions

Unbridled powers and authority to impose tax arbitrarily, without having any rationale or reasonableness, is now being regulated under constitutional restraints, whereby taxes are to be imposed reasonably, without discrimination and in such manner that those may not encroach upon fundamental rights of a person as guaranteed under the Constitution.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Imposition of taxes", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944369

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Imposition of taxes"

PLD 1993
Revision Application No. 124 of 1983, decided on 7th September, 1992.

P L D 1993 Karachi 5

Mst. AMINA and 4 others ‑‑‑ Applicants Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through the Secretary,

Court: Tax on cinema as imposed by Municipal Committee under the notification thus, was, illegal. p. 9 C
CLC 1982
Constitutional Petition No. 964 of 1973, decided on 11th February 1982.

1982 C L C 2032

MESSRS CAKE & OIL PRODUCTS LTD. AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR & CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, NAWABSHAH

Court: Karachi
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 1245 of 1995, decided on 11th June, 1995.

1995 C L C 1903

NUSRAT TEXTILE MILLS LTD., JAUHARABAD through its Managing Director, Lahore‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, District Khushab and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1978
6th December 1977

P L D 1978 Lahore 387

MESSRS RAVI RAYON LTD. -Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE AND 2 OTHHRS — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1990
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 547 of 1979, decided on 17th October, 1979.

1990 S C M R 1520

Sh. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE

Court: High Court
PLD 1976
Writ Petition No. 2785 of 1975, decided on 27th February 1976.

1976L135

Malik NOOR MOHAAND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, JHANG THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER, DISTRICT

Court: Rr. 3, 4 & 7‑Imposition of tax‑Provisions of Rules not complied with for publication of notice before increasing fee for sale of cattle in mandis‑Held, such increase in fee can be challenged in petition under Art. 199, Constitution of Pakistan (1973).‑Writ.
MLD 2004
2003-August-28

2004 M L D 1612

MUHAMMAD SALEEM QURESHI-Plaintiff Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 1113 of 1975, decided on 16th February 1976.

P L D 1978 Lahore 207

REHMATULLAH AND 19 others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION , LAHORE AND 2 OTHSRS — Respondents

Court: -- Ss. 33 & 34 read with Wait Pakistan Imposition of Taxes Rule, 1960, r. 7(1) & (2)-Retrospectively-Taxation proposals sanctioned under sub-rule (1)-To be notified in official Gazette -Such proposals come into force on and with effect from date subsequent to issue of notification as may be specified in notification-Gazette published on 29-8-1975-Commissioner's order itself containing condition of proposals to come into force from date of publication of notification--Held : In view of such reservation in notification itself and of law contained in sub-rule (2), notification could not be given retrospective effect and petitioners not liable to pay at enhanced rate before 29-8-75.-Notification.
SCMR 1982
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 667 of 1979, decided on 9th August 1981.

1982 S C M R 74

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF Etc-Petitioners Versus COMMISSIONER, LAHORE ETc-Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1991
N/A

1991 M L D 1492

Messrs DURA FOAM (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus UNION COUNCIL KAMAHAN, TEHSIL CANTT., DISTRICT LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore