Imposition of taxes
Imposition of taxes legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner was owner of stone crusher plant and was aggrieved of levy of tax/fee by Tehsil Municipal Administration on transportation of sand and crushed stone
Validity
Business of petitioner was not regulated by any of the local government either under provisions of erstwhile North Western Frontier Province Local Government Ordinance, 2001 or Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013
Petitioner placed on file, decision taken by Local Government Council regarding imposing of tax by Tehsil Municipal Officer on mineral products which tax was declared to be not in accordance with Third Schedule, Part-III of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013
When decision was taken regarding one district, then same was equally applicable to similar activities being carried out in another district
Activities being carried out by petitioner were at par regarding which decision had been taken earlier
High Court declared that Tehsil Council had no authority to levy any tax/fee on production of stone, sand/bajri
High Court declared notification in question as without lawful authority
Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances.
Petitioner was owner of stone crusher plant and was aggrieved of levy of tax/fee by Tehsil Municipal Administration on transportation of sand and crushed stone
Validity
Business of petitioner was not regulated by any of the local government either under provisions of erstwhile North Western Frontier Province Local Government Ordinance, 2001 or Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013
Petitioner placed on file, decision taken by Local Government Council regarding imposing of tax by Tehsil Municipal Officer on mineral products which tax was declared to be not in accordance with Third Schedule, Part-III of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act, 2013
When decision was taken regarding one district, then same was equally applicable to similar activities being carried out in another district
Activities being carried out by petitioner were at par regarding which decision had been taken earlier
High Court declared that Tehsil Council had no authority to levy any tax/fee on production of stone, sand/bajri
High Court declared notification in question as without lawful authority
Constitutional Petition was allowed in circumstances.
Legislature has vast powers to levy and impose tax on income of persons, pursuant to Entry No.47 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule to the Constitution and to prescribe tax rates thereon by introducing Bill in terms of Art. 73 of the Constitution
Such legislation has to undergo test of Constitutional constraints
Legislative competence of imposing taxes is also subject to scrutiny by High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution and by Supreme Court under Art. 184 of the Constitution, particularly if a levy or enactment has been challenged for being discriminatory, confiscatory or violative of fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Constitution
Concept of absolute authority to impose tax by rulers on their subjects, without having any representation of people in such legislation, is no more available under the Modern Democratic System of Governments, which are run by elected representatives of people under their respective Constitutions
Unbridled powers and authority to impose tax arbitrarily, without having any rationale or reasonableness, is now being regulated under Constitutional restraints, whereby taxes are to be imposed reasonably, without discrimination and in such manner that those may not encroach upon fundamental rights of a person as guaranteed under the Constitution.
Legislature has vast powers to levy and impose tax on income of persons, pursuant to Entry No.47 of Federal Legislative List of Fourth Schedule to the Constitution and to prescribe tax rates thereon by introducing Bill in terms of Art.73 of the Constitution
Such legislation has to undergo test of Constitutional constraints
Legislative competence of imposing taxes is also subject to scrutiny by High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution and by Supreme Court under Art.184 of the Constitution, particularly if a levy or enactment has been challenged for being discriminatory, confiscatory or violative of fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Constitution
Concept of absolute authority to impose tax by Rulers on their subjects, without having any representation of people in such legislation, is no more available under the Modern Democratic System of Governments, which are run by elected representatives of people under their respective Constitutions
Unbridled powers and authority to impose tax arbitrarily, without having any rationale or reasonableness, is now being regulated under constitutional restraints, whereby taxes are to be imposed reasonably, without discrimination and in such manner that those may not encroach upon fundamental rights of a person as guaranteed under the Constitution.
"Imposition of taxes", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944369
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Imposition of taxes"
P L D 1993 Karachi 5
Mst. AMINA and 4 others ‑‑‑ Applicants Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through the Secretary,
Court: Tax on cinema as imposed by Municipal Committee under the notification thus, was, illegal. p. 9 C1982 C L C 2032
MESSRS CAKE & OIL PRODUCTS LTD. AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR & CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, NAWABSHAH
Court: Karachi1995 C L C 1903
NUSRAT TEXTILE MILLS LTD., JAUHARABAD through its Managing Director, Lahore‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, District Khushab and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1978 Lahore 387
MESSRS RAVI RAYON LTD. -Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE AND 2 OTHHRS — Respondents
Court: High Court1990 S C M R 1520
Sh. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE
Court: High Court1976L135
Malik NOOR MOHAAND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, JHANG THROUGH CHIEF OFFICER, DISTRICT
Court: Rr. 3, 4 & 7‑Imposition of tax‑Provisions of Rules not complied with for publication of notice before increasing fee for sale of cattle in mandis‑Held, such increase in fee can be challenged in petition under Art. 199, Constitution of Pakistan (1973).‑Writ.2004 M L D 1612
MUHAMMAD SALEEM QURESHI-Plaintiff Versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI and others — Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1978 Lahore 207
REHMATULLAH AND 19 others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION , LAHORE AND 2 OTHSRS — Respondents
Court: -- Ss. 33 & 34 read with Wait Pakistan Imposition of Taxes Rule, 1960, r. 7(1) & (2)-Retrospectively-Taxation proposals sanctioned under sub-rule (1)-To be notified in official Gazette -Such proposals come into force on and with effect from date subsequent to issue of notification as may be specified in notification-Gazette published on 29-8-1975-Commissioner's order itself containing condition of proposals to come into force from date of publication of notification--Held : In view of such reservation in notification itself and of law contained in sub-rule (2), notification could not be given retrospective effect and petitioners not liable to pay at enhanced rate before 29-8-75.-Notification.1982 S C M R 74
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF Etc-Petitioners Versus COMMISSIONER, LAHORE ETc-Respondents
Court: High Court1991 M L D 1492
Messrs DURA FOAM (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus UNION COUNCIL KAMAHAN, TEHSIL CANTT., DISTRICT LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore