Home Maxims & Terms Meaning and connotation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Meaning and connotation

Meaning and connotation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2024 CLC 2052 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
S.100Word 'charge'Meaning and connotationCreation of 'charge' on the subject houseNon-mentioning of anything in written statement about 'charge'Divergent pleadings of the tenantEffect'Once a tenant is always tenant', principle ofScopeCharge on an immovable property is created to secure payment of money

In a charge, there is no transfer of any interest in favour of the charge holder, however, he is only entitled to recover his money from the property

Under S.100 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, it is expedient that there must be a clear intention to make a particular property a security for the payment of a debt

Where the property is not intended to serve as a security, there can be neither a mortgage nor a charge

Tenant had not pleaded that he paid the amount to the landlady as a debt and in exchange, the landlady had created a charge on the subject house to secure repayment of the money

Tenant had pleaded contradictory stances of purchase and charge and also admitted title of the respondent and payment of rent, thus, he was neither purchaser of the subject house nor charge holder and was a tenant on the principle that, 'once a tenant is always a tenant'

Appeal was dismissed accordingly.

2017 PTD 2296 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(33) & 2(41)Expression "transfer of the right to dispose of goods as owner"Meaning and connotation

Term "sale" and the words "other transfer of the right to dispose of goods as owner" used in S. 2(33) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 were similar and had to be read ejusdem generis with each other; and given the context, the said words had to be given a meaning which appeared to determine its most apt and likely sense.

2015 PLC(CS) 73 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Hajj"Meaning and connotation

Word "Hajj" (the holy pilgrimage) means "to intend a journey" which connoted both the outward act of a journey and the inward act of intentions.

2015 PLC(CS) 411 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Ad hoc" and "Acting charge"Meaning and connotation

Word "ad hoc" itself reflected that an incumbent was holding the charge as stop-gap arrangement as the vacant post was not filled up through due process

Word "acting charge" had wider connotation, as a person performing duties on acting charge basis exercised full powers of the office and could not be considered to be appointed on the basis of stop-gap arrangement.

2014 SCMR 484 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Hajj"Meaning and connotation

Word "Hajj" (the holy pilgrimage) meant "to intend a journey" which connoted both the outward act of a journey and the inward act of intentions.

2014 PLD 57 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words "established or constituted under" an Act or any other law being in force for the time beingMeaning and connotation

"By an Act" would mean by a provision directly enacted in the statute in question and which is gatherable from its express language or by necessary implication therefrom

Words "under an Act" would, in that context, signify what was not directly to be found in the statute itself but was conferred or imposed by virtue of powers enabling this to be done; in other words, by laws made by a subordinate law-making authority which was empowered to do so by the parent Act.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Meaning and connotation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944374

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Meaning and connotation"

MLD 1987
Case decided on 21st October. 1987.

1987 M L D 3039

Court: Karachi
CLC 1994
Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1994, decided on 10th April, 1994.

1994 C L C 1593

FAISAL BASHIR‑‑‑Appellant Versus NOMINATION BOARD, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND

Court: S.C. (AJ&K)
CLC 1989
Constitutional Petition No.675 of 1984, heard on 9th January, :1989.

1989 C L C 1134

Messrs SOUVENIR TOBACCO COMPANY LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS

Court: Karachi
PLD 1988
Constitutional Petition No.S‑54 of 1988, decided on 21st August, 1988.

P L D 1984 Karachi 625

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. RUKHSANA BEGUM and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Valid retirement of husband and wife‑‑Meaning and connotation‑ Presumption of consummation of marriage‑‑Validity of.‑‑Words and phrases.
MLD 1990
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2575/B of 1989, decided on 23rd August, 1989.

1990 M L D 184

ABDUR RAZZAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1969
First Appeal from Order No. 33 of 1960, decided on 5th November 1968.

P L D 1969 Lahore 453

Mian FAZAL MUHAMMAD NIZAM‑UD‑DIN BAIG & Co. — ‑Appellant Versus THE PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑ — Respondents

Court: S. 20‑Words "carries on business"‑‑Used in their primary and natural meaning and connote business carried on for pecuniary profits and gains by business and trading houses‑Government engaged in commercial activities as part of its duties‑--Not such business or trading house‑Cannot be deemed to carry on business at its principal seat of office and sued there irrespective of place where part or whole of cause of action accrued to plaintiff‑Arbitration Act (X of 1940), S. 31(3) Federation of Pakistan v. The Co‑operative Insurance Society of Pakistan Ltd. Lahore P L D 1956 Lah. 178 overruled.
MLD 1997
File No.88 of 1995, decided on 7th December, 1995.

1997 M L D 156

KHADIM HUSSAIN QAISER, ADVOCATE/MEMBER, PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL, GUJRAT‑‑Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDENT, BAR ASSOCIATION, GUJRAT and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Punjab Bar Council, Lahore
PLC(CS) 2016
S.A. No.2 of 2002, decided on 20th June, 2014.

2016 P L C (C

Dr. Syed ALI SANA BOKHARI Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal
PCRLJ 1983
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 85 of 1982, decided on 7th November 1982.

1983 P Cr

Sardar MUHAMMAD YUSUF KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)
CLC 1994
Writ Petitions Nos. 7572 of 1989 and 2993 of 1993, decided on 8th June, 1993.

1994 C L C 1034

PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, EXCISE AND TAXATION and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore