Home Maxims & Terms Recovery of skeleton meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Recovery of skeleton

Recovery of skeleton legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PLD 62 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 302(b)Qatl-e-amdAppreciation of evidenceRecovery of skeletonMurder, proof ofExtra judicial confession

Son of complainant went missing and ten days after one skeleton was found from bamboo crop which was alleged to be that of missing son and accused persons were sent to face trial for committing his murder

Trial Court convicted both the accused and awarded death sentence to one accused while the other was awarded imprisonment for life

Validity

On tenth day of missing of complainant's son, when a skeleton was found, it was believed by prosecution witnesses and complainant to that of missing boy's

In absence of any evidence with regard to attack of animals on dead body of deceased, it was not believable that dead body of human was completely decomposed within a period of ten days and converted into a complete skeleton

To prove offence of murder, death should be homicidal of which onus in criminal trial was on prosecution

In absence of legal proof of death being homicidal, because of serious lacuna of not obtaining report of Anatomy Expert to prove homicidal death, the benefit must go to accused and not to prosecution as the same sealed the fate of prosecution

Prosecution failed to prove with convincing evidence that a skeleton found on tenth day of missing of boy in bamboo crop was that of complainant's son

Even if it was believed that the skeleton was that of complainant's son, even then prosecution failed to establish homicidal death and it was beyond understanding as to how accused persons opened their breast by confessing murder before a person who was not previously known to them

Evidence with regard to extra judicial confession on the part of prosecution was result of padding by prosecution in order to add some colour in faded picture of prosecution

High Court, in exercise of appellate jurisdiction, set aside conviction and sentence awarded to accused persons by Trial Court and acquitted them of the charge

Appeal was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Recovery of skeleton", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944375

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Recovery of skeleton"

PCRLJ 2017
N/A

2017 P Cr

AURANGZAIB alias GUDDU — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2017
2017-April-6

2017 M L D 1962

SAID AMIN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PCRLJ 1968
Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 1967, decided on 22nd December 1967.

1968 P Cr

KHADIM HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2011
2011-February-2

2011 P Cr

Mst. BASRAN BIBI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PCRLJ 2004
2004-June-23

2004 P Cr

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1998
N/A

1998 P Cr

LIAQUAT ALI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2003
Criminal Petition No.325-L of 2001 decided on 10th July, 2002.

2003 S C M R 1723

MANSOOR AHMED SHAHID — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1993
1992-November-16

1993 P Cr

MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2014
N/A

P L D 2014 Lahore 62

JAVED IQBAL — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1994
Criminal Appeal No.8 of 1992, decided on 8th February, 1994.

P L D 1994 Peshawar 102

MUHAMMAD RIAZ and 3 others‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑‑Ss. 325/201/34, 201/34 & 202‑‑‑F.I.R. not proved‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Non‑proving of the first information report in the case would not per se vitiate the conviction.‑‑First Information Report.