Procedure and scrutiny
Procedure and scrutiny legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Federal Government was under an obligation to lay the Supplementary Budget Statement before the National Assembly so that it was subjected to the same scrutiny and procedure as was applicable to the Annual Budget Statement in terms of Arts. 80 to 83 of the Constitution
Supplementary Budget Statement, in the normal course, was to be placed before the National Assembly during the currency of the same financial year, if the Federal Government had decided to authorize such expenditure.
"Procedure and scrutiny", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944542
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Procedure and scrutiny"
P L D 2014 Supreme Court 131
Constitutional Petition No.20 of 2013, Human Rights Case No.11504-G of 2013 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 2960, 3566, 3579, 3649, 3865, 4022, 4135, 4208 and 4498 of 2013
Court: High Court2016 C L C 706
AZIZ MASOOD — Petitioner Versus Khawaja AHMAD HASSAN and 5 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2012 Lahore 503
Messrs TOYOTA GARDEN MOTORS (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive Officer, Lahore — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Home Secretary, Punjab, Lahore and 2 others — Respondents.
Court: High Court2018 P L C (C
Prof. Dr. ZAFAR IQBAL Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High Court1998 P T D 2311
DADAMCHAND KESHRIMAL & CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 222 I T R 433P L D 1962 Supreme Court 22
Rawalpindi AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus M. B. NISHAT AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (b) Public Conduct (Scrutiny) Ordinance (III of 1959) (as amended), S. 10 read with S. 4 and Public Conduct (Scrutiny) Rules, 1959, r. 6‑Opportunity of "appeal" against recommendation of Scrutiny Committee contemplated by r. 6 not afforded to employee‑Appointing authority's order terminating service of employee not deemed to be "within Ordinance"‑S. 10 no bar to order being challenged before Courts‑Provision as regards "appeal" of‑ mandatory character‑Zafrul Ahsan v. The Republic of Pakistan P L D 1960 S C (Pak.) 117 ref..1999 P T D 660
CHANDI RAM Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER and another
Court: 225 I T R 6112014 P L C 312
MUHAMMAD ZAHIR and another Versus ASMATULLAH and 2 others
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Balochistan2016 P L C (C
Dr. AHMAD ALI AAJIZ Versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR through Registrar and others
Court: Peshawar High Court2003 S C M R 400
MUHAMMAD JAMIL AKHTAR and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus APPELLATE AUTHORITY, DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan