Grants out of Consolidated Fund
Grants out of Consolidated Fund legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Prime Minister and Provincial Chief Minister (on their own) were not authorized to make grants out of Consolidated Fund as provided under Art. 164 of the Constitution, instead it was the Federation or Province respectively which were authorized to make such grants.
"Grants out of Consolidated Fund", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944543
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Grants out of Consolidated Fund"
P L D 2014 Supreme Court 131
Constitutional Petition No.20 of 2013, Human Rights Case No.11504-G of 2013 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 2960, 3566, 3579, 3649, 3865, 4022, 4135, 4208 and 4498 of 2013
Court: High Court2018 S C M R 407
SINDH RURAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION (SRSO) — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1975 Lahore 23
ASHFAQ‑UR‑REHMAN KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY,
Court:2016 S C M R 475
WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. through Chief Executive Officer and others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY (PTA) through Chairman and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1984 Supreme Court 80
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND ANOTHER Appellants Versus NOOR MUHAMMAD KHAN-Respondent
Court: -.-- S. 12(ii)-Martial Law Order, 1977 C. M. L. A: s No. 23-West Pakistan Civil Servants Pension Rules, 1963, r. 2.1--Guide for Retiring Government Servants, Chap. I, para. 8(c)-Expressions "service qualifying for pension" and "total service", held, distinct expressions and cannot be equated together-Person serving Central Government Department for more than eight years, after having become surplus due to winding up of said Department and remaining more than two years in surplus pool, recruited afresh by Provincial Government in provincial service. Held, service rendered by such person with Central (`3overnment could not be treated as service performed which could be counted towards qualifying him for pension-"Service" under r. 2, West Pakistan Civil . Servants Pension Rules, 1963 means service with Provincial Government and employee must have been paid by Government from provincial consolidation fund-Order of Service Tribunal holding that period of service of such person with General Government could not be considered as service with Provincial Government to be counted towards qualifying service for pension and retirement, not interfered with by Supreme Court in view of peculiar circumstances of case.-Civil service.1985 P L C (C
ABDUL HAYEE NIAZI Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT and 3
Court: Service Tribunal Punjab2016Q7
Syed ATIQ ANWAR SHERAZI — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, BALOCHISTAN — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2018 Peshawar 192
QUARBAN ALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2018 Peshawar 83
ZIAULLAH AFRIDI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court