Acquiescence of claimant heir
Acquiescence of claimant heir legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Law of limitation was not to be ignored entirely or brushed aside whenever property was claimed on the basis of inheritance
Conduct of claimant-heir might become relevant and material when the bar of time limitation was pleaded by the defendant-heir
Defendant-heir might show that claimant-heir by his/her acts, overt or implicit, demonstrated acquiescence in the defendant's title to the suit property thereby allowing him to deal with it was exclusive owner, for instance by regularly and openly disposing of parts of the property or developing it at his own expense over a period of time within the knowledge of the claimed-heir
When in such circumstances the defendant-heir transferred suit property for valuable consideration, the transferee was entitled to believe that defendant-heir had a valid title to transfer.
"Acquiescence of claimant heir", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944546
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Acquiescence of claimant heir"
P L D 2014 Supreme Court 167
Mst. GRANA through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus SAHIB KAMALA BIBI and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2026 C L C 424
ASLIYAT KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus Mst. SAEEDA and others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2020 Y L R 2645
Arbab MUHAMMAD KABIR KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus Arbab ABDUR REHMAN and others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1989 M L D 488
GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD DIN and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1983 S C M R 737
Mst. KUBRA BIBI AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus ABDUL HAQ AND 7 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: --- Art. 185(3) read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 10 & Sched.-Dispute. over transfer of property-Parties appearing before Settlement Authorities and agitating their respective contentions-Objection not raised before Chief Settlement Commissioner against his jurisdiction to hear matter and petitioner acquiescing therein-Held, can neither be raised before Supreme Court nor given any weight.-Jurisdiction,1979 S C M R 276
Mst. SAKINA (REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIRS)‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ZIA ULLAH KHAN, CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER ETC.‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2025 Lahore 581
MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 17 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2023 S C M R 1928
NOOR DIN (DECEASED) through LRs — Appellant Versus PERVAIZ AKHTAR and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1987 M L D 750
KALU — Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1989 Federal Shariat Court 143
and Allama Dr. Fida Muhammad, JJ Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑Limitation‑‑Principle of "Tamadi"‑‑Time limit can be placed both in respect of extinguishment of right and for the purpose of proving a claim‑‑When facts of a case show that owner or the holder of a right having knowledge of the fact of time limit did not claim or challenge, it will be presumed that he waived his right.‑‑ Limitation.