Subsequent suit for declaration
Subsequent suit for declaration legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Plaintiff by concealing factum of filing of earlier suit had acted in a mala fide manner, thus, he had not approached court with clean hands
Plaintiff by his such conduct had become disentitled to grant of such discretionary relief as person seeking equity would have to do equity
Such application was dismissed in circumstances.
"Subsequent suit for declaration", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944558
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Subsequent suit for declaration"
2021 C L C 1282
MOHAMMAD IQBAL — Petitioner Versus MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan1991 C L C 1305
WAPDA ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: Lahore2003 M L D 349
BAKHSHA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FALAK SHER ‑‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1992 Peshawar 84
AMIRULLAH and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2011 CLC 319
MAHBOOB AHMAD (deceased) through L.Rs. — Petitioner Versus Mst. FEROZA BEGUM and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1994 Karachi 474
ABDUL AZIZ‑‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ QURESHI Respondent
Court:2004 C L C 1371
FARZAND ALI — Petitioner Versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director Estate Management, Faisalabad and 3 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1995 Karachi 416
MUHAMMAD ZAKI and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD TAOT ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑‑0. II, R. 2 & S. 151 ‑‑Quashing of proceedings in civil suit pending in Trial Court‑‑‑Essentials‑‑‑Plaintiff had earlier filed suit for the relief of permanent injunction against defendant (vendor) when he tried to sell land‑‑‑Such suit having been dismissed plaintiff filed appeal against that judgment‑‑‑During pendency of appeal, plaintiff filed another suit against the_ defendants when the sale‑deed was executed by defendant for canceling Every suit deed, partition of property, permanent injunction etc: ‑‑Validity‑ suit was hit by provision of 0.11, R. 2, C.P.C: ‑Cause of action in both suits was prima facie, different‑‑‑Subsequent suit was, therefore, not hit by the provisions of 011, R.2, C.P.C. and same could not be quashed in circumstances. pp. 418, 419 A & B2014 C L C 65
Mst. SAEEDA — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2020 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and another — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)