Deceiving by respondent
Deceiving by respondent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Consumer sought condonation of delay on the ground that after decision of Trial Court, respondent-company approached him and promised that he would be compensated by providing 250 bags of seed of maize and thus they deceived consumer and let the limitation period expire
Validity
Explanation extended by consumer in order to seek condonation of delay caused in filing of appeal did not appeal to sense and such plea had never been recognized as justification for condonation of delay in filing of some legal proceedings
High Court declined to condone delay, as consumer failed to justify delayed filing of appeal
Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
Consumer sought condonation of delay on the ground that after decision of Trial Court, respondent-company approached him and promised that he would be compensated by providing 250 bags of seed of maize and thus they deceived consumer and let the limitation period expire
Validity
Explanation extended by consumer in order to seek condonation of delay caused in filing of appeal did not appeal to sense and such plea had never been recognized as justification for condonation of delay in filing of some legal proceedings
High Court declined to condone delay, as consumer failed to justify delayed filing of appeal
Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
"Deceiving by respondent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944559
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deceiving by respondent"
2014 C L D 257
MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Appellant Versus GENERAL MANAGER PIONEER PAKISTAN SEED LIMITED, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2014 C L C 154
MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Appellant Versus GENERAL MANAGER PIONEER PAKISTAN SEED LIMITED, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2017 Balochistan 22
BIBI HUMERA — Petitioner Versus GHULAM DASTAGIR and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1989 M L D 1137
NATIONAL DETERGENTS LIMITED‑‑Appellant Versus ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS‑II‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi2009 C L D 1005
Messrs NATIONAL TOOLS INDUSTRIES (REGD.) through Managing Partner — Appellant Versus Messrs AZHAR ENTERPRISES through Proprietor — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1959 (W
MUHAMMAD RASHID‑Convict‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1983 Karachi 357
MESSRS BURNEY'S INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL Co. LTD.-Plaintiff Versus MESSRS REHMAN MATCH WORKS-Defendant
Court:1989SCMR361
FORMICA CORPORATION — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN FORMICA LTD. — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1967 Dacca 826
MUHAMMAD SHAFIULLAH‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1967 Karachi 492
BANDENAWAZ LTD.‑Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: High Court