Furnishing of surety
Furnishing of surety legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Word "Shall" in S.375 of Succession Act, 1925 is used with reference to class of cases, which fell under Ss.373(3) & 373(4) of Succession Act, 1925, wherein, court decides to proceed in summary manner to determine right as to grant of succession certificate
In such cases S.375(1) of Succession Act, 1925 makes it incumbent on court to order issuance of certificate subject to furnishing of surety in addition to execution of bond
Where case for grant of succession certificate does not fall under S.373(3) or S.373(4) of Succession Act, 1925, it is discretionary with court to require the person in whose favour certificate is issued to give surety as condition for grant thereof.
Plaintiff filed suit for partition wherein she moved an application for preliminary decree for possession and mesne profits which was dismissed however, Trial Court directed defendant to furnish surety amount
Defendant filed application for reduction of the same which was dismissed
Validity
Impugned order was passed with the consent of parties
Defendant was estopped to challenge the validity of said order on the principle of estoppel
Defendant while filing application for reduction of surety amount was satisfied with the nature of order but was aggrieved of the quantum of surety amount
Defendant could not be allowed to approbate and reprobate
No misexercise of jurisdiction nor any illegality, irregularity, perversity or infirmity was found in the impugned order
Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
"Furnishing of surety", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944562
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Furnishing of surety"
2007 Y L R 2717
Mian MAQBOOL AHMAD through his Legal Heirs — Appellants Versus Malik MUHAMMAD IJAZ — Respondent
Court: Lahore2012 YLR 2464
Mian SIFFAT ELAHI and another — Petitioners Versus OSMAN TASSADUQ — Respondent
Court: Lahore2010 C L C 689
MUHAMMAD AKBAR ABBAS — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ZAFAR — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2015 Balochistan 127
Mst. RAZYA GHULAM and another — Petitioners Versus The GENERAL PUBLIC — Respondent
Court: High Court2001 Y L R 536
PATHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi2007 Y L R 860(1)
ALI NAWAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1975 SCMR 520
SOLE PROPRIETOR, KARACHI-Petitioner Versus MESSRS UNITED BANK, NAPIER ROAD, KARACHI-Respondent
Court: High Court2007 Y L R 2764
GHULAM FARID-Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, T.T. SINGH and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1986 P Cr
Syed SHAMSHAD RAZI Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 2020 Sindh 713
(Late) Major (Rtd.) Syed TANVIR ALI — Petitioner Versus Syeda RAFAT EIJAZ — Respondent
Court: High Court