Home Maxims & Terms Furnishing of surety meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Furnishing of surety

Furnishing of surety legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PLD 127 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 373 (3) & (4) & 375(1)Succession certificateFurnishing of surety

Word "Shall" in S.375 of Succession Act, 1925 is used with reference to class of cases, which fell under Ss.373(3) & 373(4) of Succession Act, 1925, wherein, court decides to proceed in summary manner to determine right as to grant of succession certificate

In such cases S.375(1) of Succession Act, 1925 makes it incumbent on court to order issuance of certificate subject to furnishing of surety in addition to execution of bond

Where case for grant of succession certificate does not fall under S.373(3) or S.373(4) of Succession Act, 1925, it is discretionary with court to require the person in whose favour certificate is issued to give surety as condition for grant thereof.

2014 CLC 92 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
O. XXXVIII, R. 1, O. XX, R. 12 & S.151Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 115Partition Act (IV of 1893), S. 4Suit for partitionApplication for preliminary decree for possession and mesne profitsFurnishing of suretyEstoppelInherent powers of court

Plaintiff filed suit for partition wherein she moved an application for preliminary decree for possession and mesne profits which was dismissed however, Trial Court directed defendant to furnish surety amount

Defendant filed application for reduction of the same which was dismissed

Validity

Impugned order was passed with the consent of parties

Defendant was estopped to challenge the validity of said order on the principle of estoppel

Defendant while filing application for reduction of surety amount was satisfied with the nature of order but was aggrieved of the quantum of surety amount

Defendant could not be allowed to approbate and reprobate

No misexercise of jurisdiction nor any illegality, irregularity, perversity or infirmity was found in the impugned order

Revision was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Furnishing of surety", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944562

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Furnishing of surety"

YLR 2007
R.F.A. No. 515 of 2005, decided on 10th April, 2007.

2007 Y L R 2717

Mian MAQBOOL AHMAD through his Legal Heirs — Appellants Versus Malik MUHAMMAD IJAZ — Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2012
Civil Revision No.713 of 2012, decided on 2nd March, 2012.

2012 YLR 2464

Mian SIFFAT ELAHI and another — Petitioners Versus OSMAN TASSADUQ — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2010
2009-May-26

2010 C L C 689

MUHAMMAD AKBAR ABBAS — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ZAFAR — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2015
2015-April-16

P L D 2015 Balochistan 127

Mst. RAZYA GHULAM and another — Petitioners Versus The GENERAL PUBLIC — Respondent

Court: High Court
YLR 2001
----Ss. 369 & 561-A---Review---Application for review of an order passed in a revision application can be considered on merits if a case for review is made out within the limited parameter of review and such application cannot be dismissed merely on the ground of bar of S. 369, Cr. P. C. ---Even wrong caption of an application will not make much difference as such application, if the facts and circumstances of the case so demand, can be treated as an application under S.561-A, Cr.P.C. and decided on merits.

2001 Y L R 536

PATHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
YLR 2007
Criminal Revision Application No.S-61 and M.As. Nos.1045 to 1047 of 2006, decided on 12th July, 2006.

2007 Y L R 860(1)

ALI NAWAZ — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1975
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 37-R of 1975, decided on 23rd May 1975.

1975 SCMR 520

SOLE PROPRIETOR, KARACHI-Petitioner Versus MESSRS UNITED BANK, NAPIER ROAD, KARACHI-Respondent

Court: High Court
YLR 2007
F.A.O. No.4 of 2006, decided on 26th June, 2007.

2007 Y L R 2764

GHULAM FARID-Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, T.T. SINGH and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 744 of 1985, decided on 1st July, 1985.

1986 P Cr

Syed SHAMSHAD RAZI Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 2020
2015-May-27

P L D 2020 Sindh 713

(Late) Major (Rtd.) Syed TANVIR ALI — Petitioner Versus Syeda RAFAT EIJAZ — Respondent

Court: High Court