Necessary and proper parties
Necessary and proper parties legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Provincial Government and the relevant authorities appointed by the same, who sanctioned a public document, were required to be produced before the Court when the validity of said document needed to be proved
Revenue Officers and the Provincial Government were proper parties in cases where registered sale deeds and mutations had been challenged.
Such was not a case of private ownership rather pertained to shamilat deh wherein all owners were necessary parties and in their absence no effective decree could be passed regarding ownership and possessory rights.
Necessary party is one, without whom no proper order can be made effectively, whereas proper party is one, in whose absence, although effective order can be made but presence of such party is necessary for complete and final adjudication of questions involved in any proceedings
Addition of parties is generally not a question of initial jurisdiction of Court
Such is the judicial discretion of Court, which has to be exercised after examining peculiar facts and circumstances of each case.
"Necessary and proper parties", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944569
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Necessary and proper parties"
2016 C L C 1195
ALL PAKISTAN PVC PIPE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION through Chairman — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE through Secretary and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2018 C L C 241
Mst. AILA NAWAZ — Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, KHANEWAL and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)2023 C L D 253
BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED through Official Liquidator — Plaintiff Versus GALADARI CEMENT (GULF) LIMITED and others — Defendants
Court: Sindh2004 M L D 1382
LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director‑General, LDA Plaza and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ALI MUTTQI RIZVI through Bashir Ahmad Chaudhry‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2006 Y L R 1595
FAQIR MUHAMMAD through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD YOUNIS and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2017 Y L R 1752
FALCON-I (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Attorney — Plaintiff Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance and 5 others — Defendants
Court: SindhP L D 2025 Peshawar 103
MUHAMMAD ASHIQ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD DAUD and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2008 C L C 466
S. ASIF ALI — Plaintiff Versus Haji GAHNO KHAN JATOI and 2 others — Defendants
Court: Karachi2018 M L D 866
ENGRO FOODS LTD. through duly Authorized Attorney — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and 2 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2013 Sindh 314
MARI GAS COMPANY LTD. Through Arshad Iqbal — Plaintiff Versus BYCO PETROLEUM PAKISTAN LTD. Through Chief Executive Officer and another — Defendants
Court: High Court