Home Maxims & Terms Modes of service meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Modes of service

Modes of service legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 CLC 234 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
O. V, Rr. 10, 12, 16, 17 & 20Modes of serviceSubstituted serviceModes

Three modes of service of summons for personal service: Service by affixation of summons and substituted service; service by affixation of summons to be resorted to when personal service was not possible and substituted service of the defendant should be made as a last resort and not by bypassing the first two modes of personal service and service by affixation

Substituted service was to be made where the court was satisfied that there was reasons to believe that defendant was keeping out of the way for the purpose of avoiding service or for any other reasons the summons could not be served in the ordinary way.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Modes of service", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944629

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Modes of service"

CLD 2003
First Appeal from Order No. 191 of 2002, decided on 19th September, 2002.

2003 C L D 254

others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED through Branch Manager/General

Court: Lahore
CLD 2004
First Appeal from Order No.153 of 2001, heard on 22nd October, 2002.

2004 C L D 771

Messrs MAHMOOD BROTHERS through Mahmood Ahmed and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through Manager and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2010
I.T.As. Nos. 1129/LB to. 1132/LB of 2008, decided on 20th May, 2009.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1990
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.106 of 1987, decided on 14th February, 1990.

P L D 1990 Supreme Court 497

Messrs AHMAD AUTOS and another — Petitioners Versus ALLIED BANK OF PATUSTAN LIMITED — Respondent

Court:
YLR 2002
Writ Petition No.4987/BWP of 2001, decided on 5th March, 2002.

2002 Y L R 1337

TANVIR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LIAQUATPUR and 3 others‑‑ Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1986
Suit No. 793 of 1985, decided on 13th April, 1986.

P L D 1986 Karachi 369

MESSRS ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD.‑Plaintiff Versus MESSRS TAHIR TRADERS AND 8 OTHERS‑Defendants

Court:
CLC 1991
Civil Revision No.795 of 1980, decided on 22nd April, 1991.

1991 C L C 1326

INAYAT ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus Mst. JALAN ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2025
Tax Reference No.17-P of 2022, decided on 5th November, 2024.

2025 P T D 883

COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE PESHAWAR ZONE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, PESHAWAR Versus MISS SHABNAM RIAZ

Court: Peshawar High Court
CLC 1986
Suit No. 12 of 1984, decided on 24th April, 1986.

1988 C L C 1985

UNITED BANK Ltd.‑‑Plaintiff Versus NISHAT CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES Ltd. and 6 others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
MLD 1997
Suit No.439 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No.3099 of 1991, decided on 14th May, 1996.

1997 M L D 2244

PAKISTAN KUWAIT INVESTMENT COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. ‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus FERRO ALLOYS PAKISTAN LTD. and 5 others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi