Technicalities of procedure
Technicalities of procedure legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Method of preparing joint merit list, equipping female candidates of top and bottom to oust the intermediate male candidate, cannot be said to be within spirit and object of Art.25 of the Constitution
Refusal of petitioner, a male candidate, for his admission in MBBS class on sole count for exercise of choice option by female does not seem to be justified; it is legitimate and legal right of every individual to have higher education and it would not be appropriate to deprive the petitioner from his such legitimate and legal right in name of an option choice technique, meant for female candidates alone
Technicalities of procedure should not be used as a sword but as a bridge of facilitation in achieving intended objects of legislation, rules, procedure and policy.
"Technicalities of procedure", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944631
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Technicalities of procedure"
P D 1997 Lahore 728
MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. FAZEELAT alias FAREELAT BIBI‑‑‑Respondent
Court:1982 C L C 347
ABDUL AZIZ AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus SAGHIR KHAN (MINOR)‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 M L D 923
LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Director‑General, LDA Lahore and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Haji ABDUL QADOOS‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2004 Y L R 1050
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN — Petitioner Versus FAZAL WAHID and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1999 Y L R 670
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAMO MAI and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2004 Y L R 1276
DIRECTOR-GENERAL, L.D.A. — Petitioner Versus Haji ABDUL QADOOS — Respondent
Court: Lahore1987 C L C 2398
ABDUL HAMID and 4 others‑ ‑Petitioners Versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2001 Supreme Court 209
MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑‑‑Respondent
Court:2023 Y L R 37
Syed QALANDAR HUSSAIN SHAH — Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench)P L D 1976 Karachi 506
Mst. KHATIJA KHATOON‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 10 & 25 read with Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), S. 25‑Guardian, appointment of‑Court's powers and duties in appointment of guardian or custody of minors‑In nature of parental jurisdiction‑Main question to be considered by Court‑Welfare of minor‑‑Court could consider personal law of minor but paramount consideration minor's welfare and protection of his interests‑No case under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, regarding custody or guardianship of minor could be decided merely by consent of parties or on compromise‑Pre‑trial hearing to induce parties to effect a compro mise on such matters not only unnecessary but even undesirable Mere technicalities of procedure‑Cannot affect decision of Guardian Judge based on broad principles in interests of minor.‑Custody of minor.