Home Maxims & Terms Impregnation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Impregnation

Impregnation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 PTD 145 CUSTOMS-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-KARACHI Judicial Precedent
Impregnation

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Impregnation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944675

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Impregnation"

CLC 1991
Constitutional Petitions Nos.D‑1178 of 1989 and D‑80 of 1990, decided on 7th February, 1991.

1991 C L C 1522

CRESCENT BOARD Ltd.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISING),

Court: Karachi
CLC 1988
Writ Petition No. 1928 of 1987, decided on 5th December, 1987.

1988 C L C 313

ISMAN DRUG HOUSE LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus C.A. BOKHARI, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1995
1995-May-17

1995 P Cr

KHALIL — Petitioner Versus Maulvi MISKEEN and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1990
Constitutional Petition No.D‑1644 of 1987, decided on 14th September, 1989.

1990 C L C 103

Messrs SANTEX PRODUCTS‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR I, CENTRAL EXCISE AND

Court: Karachi
PTD 2014
Customs Appeal No.K-340 of 2012, decided on 24th September, 2013.

2014 P T D 145

Messrs TRIUMPH TRADERS Versus The ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, and another

Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal, Karachi
PTD 2010
Custom Appeal No.K-348 of 2009, decided on 20th October, 2009.

2010 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Customs, Federal Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
PTD 2008
N/A

2008 P T D 345

JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PAK (PVT.) LTD. Versus PAKISTAN and others

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1991
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.670‑K of 1989, decided on 23rd May, 1990.

1991 S C M R 25

THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS, KARACHI and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Messrs SANTEX PRODUCTS‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1995
1994-November-1

1995 P Cr

ZABAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1991
Suo Motu Criminal Review No.103 of 1990 in Criminal Petition No.102 of 1990, heard on 8th January, 1991.

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 412

Mst. NASREEN‑‑Petitioner Versus FAYYAZ KHAN and another‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑ S. 10 ‑‑‑ Zina‑bil‑Jabr‑‑‑--Appreciation of evidence ‑‑‑ Sole testimony " of victim is enough for conviction in case it inspires confidence.‑‑Witness‑ Evidence.