Home Maxims & Terms Personal hearing meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Personal hearing

Personal hearing legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PLC(CS) 342 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL Judicial Precedent
S. 5Constitution of Pakistan, Art.4General Clause Act (X of 1897), S.24-ATermination of service during probation period without assigning any reasonCivil Judge-cum-Judicial MagistrateNatural justice, principles ofPersonal hearingScope"No reason clause" of appointment letterScope

Adverse remarks were recorded in the appellant's First Annual Confidential Report, which were treated advisory in nature by the Administrative Committee

Authority before passing the termination order obtained a report from the Reporting Officer regarding the work and conduct of the appellant and two other probationers, which did not disclose any adverse material against the appellant

Effect

Contention of the appellant was that no material was available on the record, which had persuaded the Authority to pass the termination order

Plea of the Authority was that conditions of appointment, agreed to by the appellant, empowered the Authority to dispense with recording of any reason while terminating the services during the probationary period

Validity

Plea of the Authority that clause of the appointment order empowered the Authority to terminate the appellant without recording any reason was not tenable

Inclusion of "no reason clause" in the appointment letter did not mean that the authority had been entrusted with unfettered authority to terminate any judicial officer without any material on the record

Rationale behind the said clause was that on the basis of the material, the authority might pass the said order without assigning any reason, but if any of the affectee challenged that order, then it must be proved by producing the relevant record

Every employee had a Fundamental Right to be treated in accordance with law

Authority was under obligation to dispense justice fairly, justly and reasonably and to at least provide an opportunity of hearing before taking the extreme step of termination so that no one could be condemned unheard

Authority without any reason and legal justification had issued the termination order and failed to substantiate the said order

Termination order was set aside

Appeal was allowed in circumstances.

2014 PLC(CS) 29 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionTermination simpliciterNatural justice, principles ofPersonal hearingScopePetitioner's contractual appointment was terminated without giving any opportunity of personal hearingContention was that termination of petitioner was in violation of principles of natural justiceValidityPetitioner was not being stigmatized so the ground of violation of natural justice was insignificantRight of hearing was always to be linked by the merits of the case and was not a technical right

Constitutional petition was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Personal hearing", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944720

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Personal hearing"

PLC 1986
Application No. 32 of 1985, decided on 14th April, 1986.

1986 P L C 880

MUHAMMAD MATLOOB Versus KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION, KARACHI

Court: IVth Labour Court Sind
PLC(CS) 1987
Case No.620/926 of 1986, decided on 13th November, 1986.

1987 P L C (C

MUREED HUSSAIN Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and 2 others

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 240/235 of 1978, decided on 18th December, 1979.

1980 P L C (C

Ch. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD Versus MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, NISHTAR HOSPITAL, MULTAN AND OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 238/471 of 1979, decided on 21st February, 1980.

1980 P L C (C

KHURSHID AHMAD MALIK Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, COMMUNICATION & WORKS DEPARTMENT

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No.520 of 1988, decided on 7th March, 1990.

1991 S C M R 194

MUHAMMAD AKBAR QURESHI‑‑Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1996
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.389 of 1994, decided on 27th March, 1995.

1996 S C M R 1724

AKBAR KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary,

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1996
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 389 of 1994, decided on 27th March, 1995.

1996 P L C (C

AKBAR KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1981
Appeal No. 179/595 of 1980, decided on 21st September, 1980.

1981 P L C (C

NOOR MUHAMMAD MALIK Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, COMMUNICATIONS & WORKS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 2006
Appeal No.498(K)(CS) of 2002, decided on 19th May, 2006.

2006 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD JAVED Versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS through Chairman and others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1989
Appeal No. KAR‑113 of 1985, decided on 23rd November, 1988.

1989 P L C 1019

MUHAMMAD RIAZ KHAN Versus Messrs PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind