Home Maxims & Terms Demolition of house meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Demolition of house

Demolition of house legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 MLD 356 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Award of damagesConditionsDemolition of houseCompensationQuantum of compensationDeterminationRule of thumbApplicabilityDevelopment Authority/defendant demolished plaintiff's house

Plaintiff challenged demolition of house before High Court, whereby the High Court declared the demolition illegal and directed to approach competent court of law for adequate compensation

Suit for damages filed by plaintiff was dismissed by Trial Court

Appellate Court allowed appeal of the plaintiff and awarded compensation along with interest thereon

Appellate Court after thrashing out the entire record and evidence had come to the conclusion that specific amount would be the correct amount for granting compensation to the plaintiff in respect of the agonies suffered

Validity

Awarding of damages was always the discretionary power of the court and such power had to be exercised keeping in view the facts of each case

No exact amount of compensation could be calculated and only a tentative assessment had to be made keeping in view the evidence produced by the plaintiff and rule of thumb could be applied in this regard

Claim of money as nearly possible to damages suffered by the plaintiff are to be granted

Defendant admitted the fact that without proper application of law they had demolished the property of plaintiff

Plaintiff had proved that she was entitled for compensation

Compensation awarded by the Appellate Court keeping in view all the attending circumstances, evidence, documents and other material appeared to be reasonable and no interference in this regard was warranted

Revision application was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Demolition of house", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944727

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Demolition of house"

CLC 2016
2015-October-5

2016 C L C 831

KHAN BAZ and another — Petitioners Versus RANRA BAZ and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 2016
Civil Appeal No. 248-L of 2009, decided on 10th March, 2016.

2016 S C M R 1134

BASHIR AHMED SHAUK — Appellant Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FAISALABAD — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1986
Writ Petition No. 1137/11 of 1977, decided on 1st October, 1985.

1986 C L C 2416

INAMULLAH ZAIDI and others — Petitioners Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2014
Civil Revision Application No.120 of 2012, decided on 10th June, 2013.

2014 M L D 356

CDGK through Administrator and 3 others — Applicants Versus Mst. SHAKEELA BEGUM through Legal Heris — Respondents

Court: Sindh
YLRN 2020
Criminal Bail Application No. 1444 of 2019, decided on 8th November, 2019.

2020 Y L R Note 54

Syed MUHAMMAD WAQAR HAIDER NAQVI — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
MLD 1995
Writ Petition No. 384 of 1995, decided on 26th January, 1995.

1995 M L D 1140

Mst. GHULAM FATIMA and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION KARIANWALA, DISTRICT GUJRAT and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1994
Writ Petition No. 2184 of 1992, decided on 15th December, 1993.

1994 C L C 1293

ABDUL QAYYUM BADAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2016
F.A.O. No. 75-P of 2012 and R.F.A. No.18-P of 2013, decided on 6th May, 2016.

2016 Y L R 2269

AAMIR MASOOD KHAN — Appellant Versus ELLAHI BAKHSH and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.14-Q and 53-Q to 62-Q of 1990, decided on 6th June, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1994

Mrs. FAIZ MUHAMMAD and 3 others — Appellants Versus WIDOW OF LATE SYED ABDUL SATTAR SHAH

Court: High Court
PLD 1956
Criminal Appeal No. 60 of 1951, decided on 17th November, 1955.

P L D 1956 Supreme Court (Ind

CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA‑Appellant Versus MULCHAND AGARWALA‑Respondent

Court: