Home Maxims & Terms Industrial undertaking meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Industrial undertaking

Industrial undertaking legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 SCMR 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 14, 34, 35 & Second Sched., Cls. 118D, 119, 122 & 125Industrial undertakingCarry forward of business loss incurred during tax holiday periodScope

Industrial undertaking was entitled to carry forward the losses incurred during the tax holiday period and have it set-off against the income earned in the assessment years beyond the tax holiday period in accordance with S. 35 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.

2017 SCMR 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 38(6) & Third Sched., R. 3AIndustrial undertakingUnabsorbed depreciation allowance

Industrial undertaking was not entitled to carry forward- to the post-tax holiday period, the unabsorbed depreciation allowances that arose during the tax holiday period.

2017 PTD 717 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 38(6) & Third Sched., R. 3AIndustrial undertakingUnabsorbed depreciation allowance

Industrial undertaking was not entitled to carry forward- to the post-tax holiday period, the unabsorbed depreciation allowances that arose during the tax holiday period.

2017 PTD 717 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 14, 34, 35 & Second Sched., Cls. 118D, 119, 122 & 125Industrial undertakingCarry forward of business loss incurred during tax holiday periodScope

Industrial undertaking was entitled to carry forward the losses incurred during the tax holiday period and have it set-off against the income earned in the assessment years beyond the tax holiday period in accordance with S. 35 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.

2017 PTD 1181 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(29C)(a)(i) to (iv), 133 & 148Mobile Cellular Policy, 2004, clause 9ReferenceQuestion of factAdvance income taxIndustrial undertakingDeterminationApplicant companies were providing cellular phone services and claimed to be "industrial undertakings"

Applicant companies were aggrieved of deduction of advance income tax by authorities under S.148(7) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Validity

Telecommunication systems used by companies engaged in providing telecommunication services were covered under the definition of an "industrial undertaking"

Data processing through various machines, equipment and other modes was also to be covered within the meaning of 'subjection of goods and materials to any process'

Appellate Tribunal on factual side had to examine the process through which telecommunication operators render the services

If Appellate Tribunal failed to advert to a question of law or fact raised before it or before any other forum under the relevant statute, it was treated as a question of law for the purposes of S.133 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

High Court set aside the order remanded the matter and directed the Appellate Tribunal to advert to factual aspects in each case

Reference was decided accordingly.

2014 PTD 397 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
S.2(29C)Industrial undertakingDetermination of

Meaning of words given in one statute could not be imported or read into any other statute unless so expressly authorized by the legislature

Whether any entity qualifies to be an 'industrial undertaking' for the purpose of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 needs to be determined exclusively with reference to the provisions of S.2(29C) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

2014 PTD 397 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 65B & 2(29C)Tax credit for investmentIndustrial undertakingTaxpayer, a Gas distribution company

Not covered under the definition of "industrial undertaking" and not entitled to take tax credit under S.65B of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Finding by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the First Appellate Authority were in consonance with provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001

Appeal on that score was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Industrial undertaking", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944766

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Industrial undertaking"

PTD 1998
Tax Case No. 556 (Reference No.296 of 1983), decided on 7th, March, 1996.

1998 P T D 1325

AGROCARGO TRANSPORT LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 224 I T R 90
PTD 1989
ITA. No.1651/KB of 1984-85, decided on 29th January, 1989.

1989 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2006
S.A.Os. Nos.4 to 6 of 1999, decided on 14th September, 2005.

2006PTD137

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX COMPANIES ZONE, PESHAWAR Versus FOAR ENGINEERING, PESHAWAR

Court: Peshawar High Court
PTD 2004
I.T.As. Nos.2804/KB and 2830/KB of 1993‑94, decided on 31st December, 2003.

2004 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2000
Tax Case No. 1353 of 1985, decided on 29th April, 1997

2000 P T D 1085

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus PANDIAN CHEMICALS LTD.

Court: 233 I T R 497
PTD 2013
N/A

2013 P T D 1883

Messrs NISHAT DAIRY (PVT.) LTD. through Company Secretary Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1998
I.T.A. No. 1316/KB of 1997-98, decided on 26th February, 1998

1998 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2004
I.T.As. Nos. 523(IB) and 526(IB) of 2003, decided on 8th January 2004.

2004 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1989
Income tax Reference No. 4108/KB of 186-87, decided on 11th April, 1989.

1989 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1996
Income Tax Reference No.22 of 1982 and Income-tax References Nos. 118 and 120 of 1981 and Income Tax Reference No.156 of 1982, decided on 6th April, 1993.

1996 P T D 166

KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 205 ITR 19