Home Maxims & Terms Dismissal of appeal being time barred meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Dismissal of appeal being time barred

Dismissal of appeal being time barred legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 YLR 381 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 5LimitationCondonation of delayPrinciplesDismissal of appeal being time barredCondonation of delay on account of illness of appellantScopeAppellant had averred that he was unable to file appeal within time as he was hospitalized due to illnessValidity

In order to prove illness, the petitioner had not annexed any document showing that either he was ill or was admitted at hospital for his medical treatment

Mere bald and oral statement that the petitioner could not prefer appeal within time due to his indisposition could not be a sufficient ground to condone the delay caused in filing the appeal

In order to seek condonation of delay caused in filing of a lis, litigant must explain the delay of each and every day which the petitioner had not so explained

Revision petition was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Dismissal of appeal being time barred", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124944826

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dismissal of appeal being time barred"

CLC 2001
Second Appeal from Order No.201 of 2000, decided on 26th October, 2000.

2001 C L C 647

HABIB‑UR‑REHMAN ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus Mst. MAQSOODAN BEGUM and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1998
Writ Petition No. 6003 of 1996, heard on 27th August, 1997.

1998 C L C 263

BASHIR AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SHEIKHUPURA and another‑‑ Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2014
Civil Revision No.88-D of 2013, decided on 31st July, 2013.

2014 Y L R 381

MUHAMMAD YAMEEN — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT EXECUTIVE OFFICER SCHOOLS AND LITERACY, D.I. KHAN — Respondent

Court: Peshawar
YLR 2011
Civil Revision No.60-D of 2010, decided on 4th March, 2010.

2011 Y L R 1576

SAIF-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus Mst. GULNAZ and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2005
S.As. Nos.50, 89 of 2001, 6, 7 of 2002 and 66, 68 and 108 of 2003, decided on 29th April, 2004.

2005 P L C (C

MIRRA KHAN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, through Secretary, Agriculture Department, Civil Secretariat, Quetta and others

Court: Balochistan Service Tribunal
PLD 2010
2010-January-15

P L D 2010 Lahore 175

Mrs. NASIRA IQBAL — Petitioner Versus APPEAL COMMITTEE (PUNJAB NO.II), PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL through Chairman and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1989
Appeal No. Nil, decided on 19th January, 1989.

1989 M L D 1864

DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION, LAHORE‑‑Appellant Versus S.M.SAMIUZZAMIR ADVOCATE and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Appeal Committee (Punjab II) Pakistan Bar Council
PLD 2014
2014-February-24

P L D 2014 Lahore 369

HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, RAWALPINDI through Taufiq Asif, President and Members Executive Committee — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL through Vice Chairman and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2000
Writ Petition No. 12104 of 2000, heard on 11th July, 2000.

2000 M L D 1962

ATTA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Appellant Versus Rao MUHAMMAD USMAN KHAN, ADVOCATE and 8 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS)N 2017
Civil Appeal No.281 of 2014, decided on 7th January, 2015.

2017 P L C (C

SHAUKAT HUSSAIN AWAN Versus AJ&K BAR COUNCIL through Vice-Chairman, AJK Bar Council, Muzaffarabad and 4 others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)